Catholic Russia Converted Ideas

According to the Wikipedia article concerning Galileo's Controversy over Heliocentrism, one might wrongly believe, that the Earth moves around the Sun...

The Bible is against Galileo and Copernicus, and now I believe that the Bible is indeed correct—and not the modern science—in this domain.

A bit further in this chapter, I'll try to explain some passages from the Jerusalem Bible or the Vatican Bible. Translations may differ slightly in meaning from one Bible to another...

Science can be wrong sometimes, yes. The errors of science in contradiction to the Bible generally appear in areas that are hard to prove and/or hard to believe, namely: scientific dating versus the literal biblical timelines, astronomy (e.g., heliocentrism versus geocentrism), the theory of evolution and the Big Bang theory versus Adam and Eve and the six days of the Creation. More details are available at https://christianideas.eu, in the scientific chapters...

Big Bang or 6 Days Theory?

I now believe that the account of the Creation in six days, as told in the Book of Genesis, is literally true, even if it is hard to believe... because Heaven, in several messages, and also in the New Testament, tends to confirm, literally, the account of the Creation in six days, for example, by affirming the existence of Adam, and tends to oppose the modern scientific theories of Evolution and of the Big Bang.

Adam was created at the sixth day of Creation, about 6,100 years ago, according to the Bible and to a message from Heaven (in French) at http://vincentdetarle.free.fr

Several of these messages from Heaven can be found at the old website apparitionsmariales.org (in French), in http://vincentdetarle.free.fr...

Watch out: some of those messages, especially those concerning astronomy and the Creation of the Universe, may also contain errors—for example, the one that says the Moon has been orbiting the Earth for millions of years... because this contradicts the Biblical account of the Creation in six days, specifically the creation of the Moon on the fourth day, about 6,100 years ago.

What I believe happens is that most of the messages from Heaven are correct, but, in some cases, the visionaries may not believe what Heaven reveals regarding astronomy and the Creation in six days... One or another visionary may instead believe in the pseudo-scientific modern explications, in the those areas, and tend to change the content of the original messages from Heaven.

The fake theories of the Big Bang and Evolution are now prestigious and widely accepted in the West, and modern people generally no longer believe in the recite of the creation of the world in six days, which is harder to believe.

Some believers have tried to mix both models—the scientific and the biblical one (from the Book of Genesis)—because the sequence seems to be (more or less) the same: in the beginning, the cosmos and light appeared; afterwards, the nature appeared; and, finally, the man appeared...

However, this reasoning conflicts with the biblical timeline (Adam was created about 6,100 years ago...), and God created the Moon and the stars (the cosmos), only in the fourth day—not in the first day, as one would expect when analyzing the official, alternative scientific theories on this subject...

We could try using “elastic” periods, to describe the six days of the Creation, in order to try to conciliate the scientific theories and the 'six days of the Creation'.

But then we fall into contradiction again, because some of the first days would last billions or millions of years, others only thousands, and last one, the Sabbath, is indeed the normal 24-hour day: the common Saturday!

This cannot be. The Theory of Evolution (and Big Bang) and the Biblical account of the Creation in six days are not compatible. Period.

Official History, Demography, and the Bible— when taken literally—also contradicts the delicious, logical and credible long scientific timelines: 4.000 years ago, the Earth was nearly empty, after the great Flood. Fossils are proofs of existence, not of long timespans...

The source of Eden, the Eden Lake, can still be located in Eastern Turkey. Two of the four rivers of Eden, the Tigris and the Euphrates, are still there... More information over these subjects, in the chapters ‘Eden’, ‘Noah’s Ark’, ‘Atlantis’ and ‘Arguments Against Darwinism’.

But the prestige and professionalism of the official science, along with its logical and credible explanations in domains difficult to prove— such as the account of Adam and Eve—may confuse many modern people, especially in the West.

The goal is to weaken the faith, to make people stop in the true Catholic conservative faith, still under the authority of the Pope, in order to be distracted of the danger of the Apocalypse. When the apocalyptic catastrophe comes unexpectedly, they may not be protected and will suffer severe punishments—apocalyptic tribulations.

Discretion, temptation, and other tactics also contribute to this. More on over these subjects can be found in the chapters 'Danger of Apocalypse' and 'Discernment'.

More details about the Big Bang Theory and the Bible, in the section 'Is the Universe in Expansion?'

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Ecclesiastes 1:5 "The Sun Rises, Sets and Returns Back to Its Place"

Ecclesiastes 1:5-6, corrected with a Dutch Bible of 1906, says that:

"5 And the sun rises and sets and returns quickly to its place"

"6 And the sun goes to South and goes to North [corrected with a Dutch Bible of 1906]..."

The different Bible's versions say more or less the same over Ecc 1:5 (note: seasonal effects are not relevant for this analysis).

Hypothesis 1: This verse refers to the apparent movement of the Sun, using common-sense language. Even in physics, we study these kind of phenomena. Do you still remember relative movements and speeds? Yes, this is indeed science, but we must shift the frame of reference, placing the Earth as the center, something we often forget to do. There are here two possibilities here: either translation or rotation of the Earth. But as we know, during a 24-hour period, the movement in question would be the rotation of the Earth around its (imaginary) axis.

The Bible’s primary goal is not to provide scientific precision, but to reinforce true faith and religion. Therefore, its language is adapted for people with no scientific background, in order to be understood by all.

However, we must not naively believe everything science tells us—especially if it is unproven, which is the case here. Why? Because science can be used for good, but also for evil. It may be used to discredit the Bible in scientific domains, such as astronomy, the seven days of the creation and the biblical chronology.

In this case, the Book of Ecclesiastes may be literally correct also, even if the modern science now contradicts it.

How? Simply because it is hard or impossible to prove for the average person—and maybe even for professionals in the field. All it takes is a group of science professionals aligned with evil to promote a scientific lie and to go against the scientific views of the Catholic clergy.

What happens is that the scientists are professionals in these domains, and the Catholic clergy is not.

When something is unproven or hard to prove, the clergy has no way to refute the experts in this scientific fields.

So, it could also be a scientific lie (such as “the Earth orbits around the Sun” or “the Earth rotates around its axis every 24 hours”). But this claims are also unproven—or at least hard to prove.

What I see is that the Sun turns around the Earth and it returns to the same place the next day... just as the Bible says. Is it false? Maybe, but science should provide the proof—which it hasn’t, at least for the normal person.

Which of the two possible movements—producing the same astronomical effect— is the true one? It is hard or impossible to prove, for the normal person.

If the pro-lie lobby wins in science, it's enough to declare the scientific falsehood as a professional secret, in order to intimidate and silence honest scientists working in those institutions—by threatening their careers reputations, and future.

This can intimidate them, and they may simply remain silent on the issue.

Now, I believe that the Sun revolves around the Earth—not the other way around. I also don't think the Earth rotates on its axis in "24 hours" to cause that day-night effect.

More details can be found at the section 'The Earth at the Center of the Universe?'.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

The Earth: In the Center of the Universe?

The planet Earth may well be the center of the universe for God—not necessarily in a geographic sense (with all the universe revolving around it), but surely in a non-literal sense: Earth is the most important inhabited planet in the universe (said God), and therefore, the one at the center of God’s attention.

Further details on the extraterrestrials in the section 'Theory About Atlantis and the Extraterrestrials', in the chapter ‘Atlantis’.

Now I believe even more that Earth is the center of the universe—at least, the center of the visible universe. Earth is at the center of the visible universe, simply because (at night, with clear sky) we can observe the stars in the sky in a way that places us at the center of a sphere, where the stars appear on the surface of the upper half of that sphere.

This is not enough to prove that the Earth is the center of the universe, and the book of Genesis, in the passage about the fourth day of the creation, is not sufficient proof either.

We cannot prove it, but Earth already existed before the seven days of creation, and the simplest way for God to create the rest of the universe would be to place the Sun, the other planets, and the stars moving around the Earth.

Other possibilities exist, but they're more complex to implement.

Perhaps the Sun revolves around Earth, as stated in the book of Ecclesiastes. The opposite could also be true, as the modern science defends—for example, via the relative motion of Earth orbiting the Sun (though what we actually observe is the Sun moving around Earth) or by a "static" Sun, during a full rotation of the planet Earth around its axis during a 24-hour period.

What might reinforce the theory that Earth is the center of the visible universe—with the stars and Sun turning around it—is something, to be confirmed, that a friend once told me: that to calculate the latitude of a location (e.g., when getting a boat license), some cartographic and astronomical knowledge is required. In this context, the "apparent" movement of the stars around Earth is used to determine correctly the latitude.

The assumption is that the planet Earth rotates, and that that movement of the stars around it does not actually exist—similar to the explanation for the "apparent" movement of the Sun around the Earth in 24 hours, which modern science also claims is only apparent.

According to the modern science, such movements of the Sun and distant stars around the Earth are merely relative or apparent, and it is in fact Earth that rotates around its axis to cause such effects.

A second movement of the Earth also exists, according to modern science: the movement of translation of Earth around the Sun during 365 days. However that movement is irrelevant for the biblical passage in Ecclesiastes, which suggests the Sun revolves around the Earth in a 24 hours period.

Still, both interpretations—the "apparent" movement of the stars around the Earth, or the rotation of Earth around its axis—allow us to correctly calculate the latitude of a location.

This "apparent" movement of the stars might suggest that the Sun and stars do, in fact, revolve around Earth, literally.

The second possibility, for a period of 24-hour cycle, is simply that the Sun remains nearly static while Earth performs a full rotation, around its axis.

In this case, the furthest stars, in order to seem "near static" from the Earth, should accompany the rotation movement of the Earth, performing a full orbit at enormous high speeds in only 24 hours.

This second possibility contradicts the Book of Ecclesiastes, which claims that the Sun turns around the Earth in 24 hours.

The astronomical effect of the farthest stars seeming to move "slowly" during night for a person located on Earth, would imply that they should accompany the half full rotation movement of the Earth and a relatively "small" displacement during that given night. This would mean that these stars would perform a full orbit, plus a small displacement within 24 hours—implying almost infinite, incredibly high speeds.

For that reason, this second option seems far less probable than the possibility that the Sun orbits around the Earth in a 24-hour cycle, with the stars moving "slower" around the Earth, over longer periods, and with the polar star hardly moving at all (or either being in the Rotation Axis).

The most fitting explanation for these astronomical effects is that the Sun and stars move around an (almost) static Earth: the Sun in an 24-hour orbit, and the distant stars in much larger orbits. In this case, the Sun would move relatively fast, yes, but the other stars would still move quickly, just much more slowly than in the previous alternative model.

That's why I think the Aristotle’s model of the universe is more accurate, in this regard. However, it is not fully proven either.

If the Sun indeed revolves around the Earth in 24-hour cycles, as stated in the Book of Ecclesiastes—which now seems a lot more probable to me—then there's no orbital movement of Earth, around the Sun, in ~365 days, simply because the Sun keeps revolving around the Earth every day.

Thus, Earth appears to be the center of the visible universe, also for this reason—as the ancient Greeks claimed—and perhaps even the center of the entire universe (in terms of mass).

However, we cannot prove that. With our current scientific knowledge, we are unable to reach the limits of the whole universe, as far as I know.

To check whether the stars seem to rotate (or actually do rotate) around Earth at night, under a clear sky, I think it would be enough to observe a small group of stars with a specific alignment or geometry—such as a constellation—and track its relative movement with respect to the Polar Star (which seems to remain "fixed" in the sky) at the beginning and end of the night. Doing this over several nights could reveal whether that group of stars follows a motion that resembles part of an orbit around Earth.

Not an easy task, but possibly something that could be monitored.

P.S.: in order to explain the 28-day lunar cycle, there are three possible explanations—three different types of movement that could account for this astronomical phenomenon:

A slower rotation of Earth around its axis, taking 28 days, with the Moon remaining relatively static nearby. (This would not necessarily contradict what has been previously mentioned. It’s just that this rotation is too slow to explain the Sun and stars 24-hour movement). Watch out, in this case the Moon—and possibly the stars, except for the Sun—would remain nearly "static" in the sky, with the considered motion being a slow 28-day rotation of Earth around itself.
Or the Moon revolves around a "static" Earth in an orbit lasting 28 days (the other movement, for this astronomical effect of 'Moon cycles'), and the stars also, rotate "slowly" around the Earth.
Or, a combination of both movements: some rotation of Earth around its axis, and some orbiting of the Moon around Earth happening simultaneously, resulting in the 28-day Moon cycle.

I cannot prove (yet) which of this movements is the correct one.

What I currently believe is that there is, indeed, a full rotation of Earth around its axis—but that it takes approximately 28 days, not 24 hours—while the Moon remains "static".

The problem is proving this is not easy. Even with space tourism and observing Earth from the Moon over the course of 24 hours, that would not be enough, because of the alternative movements that could produce the same astronomical effect, despite being based on very different possibilities.

Perhaps this is something that could be clarified by experts—those who place artificial satellites in orbit around Earth.

If those satellites remain fixed over specific geographical places on Earth (as seems to be the case, with GPS technology, which helps compute the geographical coordinates of a given location—e.g., via a smartphone), then those experts should know the satellite’s orbital speed, the distance it travels and the angle it completes during its orbit over a ~24 hour period. This angle would be relative to the center of the corresponding parallel circle of Earth, in regard to the given latitude.

If there's a measurable speed, a distance traveled, and an angle (or arc) on the satellite’s full orbit around Earth—such as the satellite appears stable with respect to a specific geographical point on Earth—this could help confirm the existence of a rotation of Earth around its axis.

The problem is that one would need to personally compute those speeds, distance traveled and arc/angle of the satellite in order to be sure. And that's not so easy.

If the satellite, while in orbit, completes an arc equivalent to 360°/28 during 24 hours, then the only possible explanation is that Earth rotates around itself during 28 days, creating the astronomical effect of the Moon cycle, with the Moon remaining static or stable.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

How Can We Prove the Rotation of the Earth in 28 Days and the Orbit of the Sun Around the Earth in 24 Hours?

In the previous sections on the Bible and astronomy—for example, "the Sun Turns Around the Earth?" and "the Earth in the Center of the Universe?"—through divine inspiration, I concluded that Earth rotates around itself in approximately 28 days, in order to explain the lunar cycle. That, in principle, is not easy to prove—except, perhaps, for the satellite conceivers.

And Is It Possible to Prove This Rotation of the Earth, in 28 Days, in an Easy Way?

With the Help of God, yes. We can simply perform an attentive analysis of a weather pressure chart and the respective weather satellite charts, for example, on BBC Weather at https://www.metoffice.gov.uk and Sat24 at https://www.sat24.com.

We know from secondary School (Geography, Weather Chart Analysis), that depressions normally move to the east, and this is sometimes visible in the weather forecast charts. This was explained as an effect of the Coriolis force, although it was difficult to fully understand.

Please don't take into account the movements of depressions near Spain and Portugal. This exception is normally caused by something like the "HAARP machine" for artificial weather/climate change, used to provoke warmer artificial temperatures and drier climates in the Mediterranean latitudes. Because the depressions in the Azores should normally only move eastwards, and not systematically move northeastwards...

The good examples are those around latitude 65° North, further north, where the depressions normally move only to the east, without causing "climate change effects."

However, there's a war between good and evil, and with the ~“HAARP machine", anticyclones may be blocked further north, as well.

In order to cut through this "fog" effect and confusion, one should refer to the historical weather pressure charts across several days.

But not all depressions are yet blocked by something like a 'climate change machine,' and we can still observe this eastward movement.

There's also another exception to the general eastward movement: cold anticyclones, like the "Siberia Anticyclone", can indeed remain stationary, spontaneously, due to the "cold" effect that accompanies Earth's rotation.

Thus, in some cases, this "stationary" effect may still happen, even if Earth rotates fully around its axis in 28 days.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

How Does This Eastward Movement Explain the Rotation of the Earth, in 28 Days and the Orbit of the Sun Around the Earth in 24 Hours?

Simply: the Earth rotates approximately 1/28 of 360° per day, but the air masses do not.

This causes the relative movement of the depressions when we decide that a geographical point (on Earth's surface) is considered "fixed" (the principle of relative movement, with the change of reference frame).

We may analyze the chart—for example, from Reykjavik, Iceland—for three days of the weather forecasting, and we consider Reykjavik as static, even though the city actually moves 1/28 of 360° along its parallel every day...

But the air/depressions don't normally accompany this movement. However, relative to Reykjavik, it seems that the depressions are moving, because of this relative motion.

Please note that is now relatively easy to unmask the falsehood of the Earth’s rotation (around its axis) occurring only in 24 hours:

What is valid for the Sun is also valid for the depressions!

If the Sun remains "static", as the air masses/depressions, then after 24 hours—following a full rotation of the Earth around its axis—the Sun appears to return to the same place in the sky. But the same would be true for depressions (not considering the spiral effect)!

That means, that, after 24 hours, the depression under analysis should have completed a full orbit around the Earth, not just ~1/28 of 360° in relative movement.

Thus, this may explain the lunar cycle, through the slower rotation of Earth, around its axis in approximately 28 days.

We could notice that, if we turn a globe of the Earth, around its axis and place a finger nearby—without touching the globe—that the globe indeed rotates, but the finger doesn't follow it. This is also valid for the clouds of a depression: the Earth turns/rotates, but the clouds don't accompany that rotation movement, thus explaining the eastward movement of depressions through relative motion.

Since the Earth rotates 360° around its axis over a period of 28 days—explaining the Moon cycle—it becomes impossible to explain the 24-hour phenomenon of day and night through the official model of a full Earth rotation during only 24 hours...

Either the Earth completes one full rotation around its axis in 24 hours...
Or the Earth completes one full rotation around its axis in 28 days...

...but it’s impossible for the Earth to perform both full rotations at the same time.

Because of this, the phenomena of day and the night can only be explained by the alternative astronomical movement that creates the same "day night" effect: The Sun turns around the Earth, completing a full orbit in 24 hours—literally, as the Biblical book of the Ecclesiastes says.

To be more rigorous, the Sun performs an orbit of ~373°, in 24 hours. Why?

The Earth performs a rotation arc/angle of 360°/28 = ~13°, toward the west. If depressions moved eastward in relative motion, this means that, in reality, they're approximately static (except for the spiral effect), and that the Earth moves westward by the same ~13°—an effect comparable to being inside a subway car and seeing the station appear to move backwards.

We know that the Sun rises from the east and moves westward... in order to compensate for the Earth’s rotation of ~360°/28, and also complete a full revolution around the Earth in 24 hours, the Sun must perform a circular orbit of ~373°.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

What About the Wind?

One might argue that the air is permanently in motion because of the existence of winds.

Winds do exist, but a part of this movement can be explained by Earth’s slow Rotation movement. This effect is similar to driving with the car window opened on a day without wind: when the car is in motion you feel wind, even though there is normally no wind at that moment.

The second explanation is that the air moves from the zones of high pressure to the zones of low pressure, following a spiral path.

Depressions have a spiral form, and the winds follow these spirals as they move from areas of high pressure to low pressure.

When there are winds from east, it means that the spiral effect is stronger than the Earth’s rotation effect.

But the winds don't change the essential point: depressions generally move eastward and this happens because of the Earth’s "slow" rotation movements around its axis—independently of the existence of winds coming from the east. This section is inspired by God.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Why Did Copernicus's Heliocentrism Triumph Over Geocentrism?

I believe there was a dispute between two groups of scientists: one aligned with the Roman Catholic Church, and another led by Copernicus.

The group supporting the Church was relatively well-prepared and grounded in the Books of Enoch, where the angels of God explained to Enoch certain aspects of astronomy, namely the movements of some stars and planets in relation to the Earth. It was explained that, at the time, the Moon revolved around the Earth and the Sun also revolved around the Earth.

The book of Ecclesiastes discreetly confirms that the Sun turns around the Earth within a 24-hour period (a day); for this, refer to the section “The Sun Rises, Sets and Returns Back to Its Place”. The Book of Ecclesiastes was written by a son of David, king in Jerusalem, supposedly the great King Solomon, the wisest man of the times in the Old Testament. And the Angels of God don't lie. Enoch was a pro-God star from the antediluvian period.

What I believe happened afterwards was that, at the time of Moses, Atlantis sank, and a few survivors from Atlantis (and Mu) departed to the Moon (see the “Theory About Atlantis and Extraterrestrials” section, in the “Atlantis” chapter, for more details). These few survivors wanted to remain discreet—they wanted to inhabit only in the permanently hidden side of the Moon.

However, at the time, the whole surface of the Moon remained visible from Earth, due to the Moon’s previous movement around the Earth, in lunar cycles of approximately 28 days.

I think that the Atlanteans of the Moon implored God to change the laws of the nature concerning the movements of the Earth and the Moon, in order to create, for the sake of discretion, a similar effect to the previous Moon cycles of ~28 days, but such way that a part of the Moon would remain permanently hidden. This way allowed the post Atlanteans to discreetly inhabit the Moon without being observed from Earth (e.g., by the presence of visible lights).

And I believe that God accepted their request. Since that time, the Moon no longer revolved around the Earth. Instead, it remained static, with a part of it permanently hidden. To reproduce the same Moon cycle effect in ~28 days, the Earth has since rotated fully around its axis over ~28 days, I think... while the Sun continues revolving around the Earth in circular orbits every 24 hours.

At the time of the Greeks (Aristotle), the astronomical knowledge received by Enoch remained the reference point, I believe: the Sun revolves around the Earth, but also an error had crept since the times of Moses, which said that the Moon revolves around the Earth in cycles of ~28 days. This error persisted because the new planetary movement—since the Atlanteans’ time on the Moon—that causes the new 28-day Moon cycles, was and is difficult to detect.

I think Copernicus, an astronomer of the XVI century (please refer to, e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org, 'Copernicus'), noticed this error in the Moon’s trajectory, and realized that the same planetary and stellar effects could be reproduced in different ways—different trajectories or rotations of the planets/stars involved.

Thus, if the Moon cycle of ~28 days could be recreated by either the Moon’s or the Earth’s movement, the Sun’s 24-hour orbit around the Earth could also be reproduced by alternative movements of the Earth and/or the Sun, giving the same visible effect.

An alternative movement was proposed: the Earth’s rotation around its axis in 24 hours, with the Sun remaining relatively static. But the ~28-day Moon cycle still had to be explained, and the easiest option was to keep the Aristotelian/Enoch model of the Moon revolving around the Earth every 28 days.

The following step was to formalize this into the heliocentric theory and to break away from geocentrism.

I believe that Copernicus and his group presented the new heliocentric theory to the Pope and his pro-God scientists, leading to a dispute.

Normally the geocentrists could successfully argue against the heliocentrists, even with the error concerning the Moon’s trajectory (difficult to notice).

But the heliocentrists—partly Catholic, but also partly Luciferian—wanted to discredit the Bible in the field of astronomy. In order to win the scientific discussion, they employed discreet forms of witchcraft, such as "burn out", "silence", "forget" and "confuse".

The Church’s pro-God scientists were not prepared for this, and they lost the war against the heliocentrists... and the situation remained that way in the years that followed. Heliocentrism triumphed from then on, despite ongoing controversies...

That's what I believe happened. I think this explanation is inspired by God. A detailed explanation of why the Sun turns around the Earth every 24 hours can be found in the section 'The Sun Rises, Sets and Returns Back to its Place'.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

The Logic of the Geostationary Satellites Contradicting Copernicus - Part I.

ESA: Geostationary orbits are at ~35.786 km from Earth.

There is a problem: According to the NASA, the distance between the Earth and the Moon is about 384.400 km, which is a contradiction to the distance of the geostationary satellite from Earth. Why? Because, according to the laws of physics, if they are correct,

|F| = GM₁M₂/d².

Assuming that the gravitational force is in equilibrium for the satellite, we have |F₁| = |F₂|, where there is a distance d₁, between the geostationary satellite and the center of the Earth, and a distance d₂, between the geostationary satellite and the center of the Moon, given by d₂ = ~384,400 km - d₁. Since the Moon is smaller than the Earth, the geostationary satellite would have to be close to the Moon to be in equilibrium, at the point where the Earth's gravity cancels out the Moon's gravity.

Therefore,

|F_{sat Earth}| = |F_{sat Moon}| ⇔

GM_satM_Earth / dist_sat_Earth² = GM_satM_Moon / (384.400 km – dist_sat_Earth)² (1)

The distance of the geostationary satellite should be approximately 350.000 km and not ~36.000 km, using this type of formula. But this would imply that, in 24 hours, the geostationary satellite would travel 2πr, i.e., ~6.28 × 350,000 km, in 24 hours, to respect the Copernicus Earth rotation, i.e., about 2.198.000 km per day, or, alternatively, 2πr / 28, to respect the Earth rotation, according to the analysis of www.christianideas.eu, i.e., about 2.198.000/28 = about 78.500 km per day, if we consider the Earth rotation in 28 days and the NASA data correct (about 384.400 km distance, between the Earth and the Moon, but the ESA data, for the distance of the geostationary satellite, would then be possibly false).

The ESA data is most likely correct, implying that the center of the Moon is about 50.000 km from Earth and not about 384.000 km, to respect the ~36.000 km and the gravitational equations, |F₁| = |F₂|, where |F| = GM₁M₂ / d².

The Mass of the Earth, according to the Wikipedia, is some 5,972 × 10²⁴ kg.

The mass of the Moon, according to the Wikipedia, is about 7,346 × 10²² kg, representing only about 1.2% of the mass of the Earth.

The geostationary satellite should therefore be closer to the Moon. Equation (1), presented previously, can be used to calculate the distance from the satellite to the Earth.

Therefore,

~~GM_sat~~M_Earth / dist_sat_Earth² = ~~GM_sat~~M_Moon / (384.400 km – dist_sat_Earth)² ⇔

M_Earth / dist_sat_Earth² = M_Moon / (384.400 km – dist_sat_Earth)² ⇔

597,2 ~~× 10²²~~ kg / dist_sat_Earth² = 7,346 ~~× 10²²~~ kg / (384.400.000 m – dist_sat_Earth)² ⇔

597,2 / dist_sat_Earth² = 7,346 / (384.400.000 – dist_sat_Earth)² ⇔

597,2 / 7,346 = dist_sat_Earth² / (384.400.000 – dist_sat_Earth)² ⇔

~ 81,296 × (384.400.000 – dist_sat_Earth)² = dist_sat_Earth² ⇔

~ 81,296 × (3,844 × 10⁸ – dist_sat_Earth)² = dist_sat_Earth² ⇔

~ 81,296 × (14,776 × 10¹⁶ – 2 × 3,844 × 10⁸ × dist_sat_Earth + dist_sat_Earth²) = dist_sat_Earth² ⇔

~ 1,201 × 10¹⁹ – 6,250 × 10¹⁰ × dist_sat_Earth + 81,296 dist_sat_Earth² = dist_sat_Earth² ⇔

80,296 dist_sat_Earth² – 6,250 × 10¹⁰ × dist_sat_Earth + ~ 1,201 × 10¹⁹ = 0 ⇔

dist_sat_Earth = ~(6,250 × 10¹⁰ ± Square Root((-6,250)² × 10²⁰ – 4 × 80,296 × 1,201 × 10¹⁹)) / (2 × 80,296) ⇔

dist_sat_Earth = ~(6,250 × 10¹⁰ ± sqrt(39,063 × 10²⁰ – 385,742 × 10¹⁹)) / 160,6 ⇔

dist_sat_Earth = ~(6,250 × 10¹⁰ ± (39,063 × 10²⁰ – 38,574 × 10²⁰)^½) / 160,6 ⇔

dist_sat_Earth = ~(6,250 × 10¹⁰ ± (0,489 × 10²⁰)^0,5) / 160,6 ⇔

dist_sat_Earth = ~(6,250 × 10¹⁰ ± 0,699 × 10¹⁰) / 160,6 ⇔

~~dist_sat_Earth = ~4,327 × 10⁸ m ∨~~ dist_sat_Earth = ~3,456 × 10⁸ m ⇒

dist_sat_Earth = ~345.600 km.

Using this type of reasoning, it is most likely that the geostationary satellite is approximately 36.000 km from Earth and that the Moon is approximately 50.000 km from Earth. It is also most likely that the Earth rotates in 28 days rather than in 24 hours, to provide more reasonable distances per hour and per day.

Assuming that the ESA is correct and that the geostationary satellite is in a circular orbit approximately 36.000 km from Earth, we can calculate the distance per day required to remain geostationary. One formula for this is the formula for the perimeter of a circle, where the radius is the distance between the appropriate point on the Earth's axis and the geostationary satellite. For simplicity, we consider the equatorial radius of the Earth in this analysis. At other important latitudes for this type of analysis, the radius of the Earth in question is smaller, the values obtained are somewhat smaller, but the basic idea remains the same. The Radius is therefore equal to ~36.000 km + the equatorial Radius of the Earth, which is approximately 6.380 km (reference: e. g., NASA). Thus, Radius = ~ 36.000 km + ~ 6.380 km = ~ 42.170 km.

Perimeter_{OrbitSatellite} = 2πr = ~ 6,28 × 42170 km = ~264828 km.

Considering that Copernicus is “correct” and that the Earth rotates around its axis in 24 hours, we have, with the ESA data, that a geostationary satellite travels 264.828 km per day, that is, 264.828 km / 24 = 11.304 km / hour.
Considering that the Earth rotates on its axis in 28 days (to account for the eastward movement of clouds and the lunar cycles), a geostationary satellite travels 264828 km / 28 = 9458 km per day, that is, 264828 km / (28 × 24) = ~394 km / hour.

I realized that there is an apparent paradox with geostationary satellites. We can calculate the distance from the Earth to place the geostationary satellite. This is the distance at which the Earth's gravitational force equals that of the Moon. But the Moon would also have to follow the geostationary satellite, otherwise the balance of gravitational forces would disappear. This would imply that the geostationary satellite and the Moon would perform orbits of ~28 days around the Earth, but the Earth also, in order to have a geostationary satellite in relation to a given point on Earth. For the face of the Moon to be permanently hidden, an additional rotation of the Moon is necessary: the rotation of the Moon around its axis in 28 days. These movements also imply (explain) the movement of the clouds to the east and the rotation of the Sun around the Earth in 24 hours. We call this explanation here "hypothesis 1".

God said that this is not 100% correct. The correct explanation is the one given in the chapter 'Bible and Science 1'. There is also a supernatural intervention. That is: the Moon remains static, with a permanently hidden face, to hide the lights and the presence of the post-Atlantean citizens there, and the Earth rotates on its axis in 28-day cycles, to explain the eastward movement of clouds. As a consequence, the geostationary satellites are in gravitational equilibrium only at the beginning. They then move in orbit, following the Earth's rotation of 360°/ 28 = 12.86° per day, but then they move away from the Moon and risk falling to Earth, because they are attracted by the Earth's gravity. The Moon, in general, cannot oppose this gravity. But God decided to help the geostationary satellites and they do not fall, by miracle. This is the explanation of the paradox. If God is fed up with this, these geostationary satellites fall to Earth. These geostationary satellites could be used by the 666 chip, to control the geographic position (GPS) of the zombies of the Apocalypse...

Therefore, if official professional scientists refuse to recognize divine intervention in the trajectory of the geostationary satellites, in order to obtain a coherent explanation, according to the laws of the physics (hypothesis 1, mentioned previously), then they must recognize that Copernicus is wrong and that the Earth rotates on its axis in 28 days and not in 24 hours. If the official scientific professionals insist on proving Copernicus right, then the Moon's cycles must be 24 hours long and the movement of the clouds to the east remains "mysterious" again. Just to remember, the Moon's cycles can be observed from Earth and they're not 24 hours long...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

The Logic of the Geostationary Satellites Contradicting Copernicus - Part II.

Professionals in the field may correctly argue that the normal gravitational logic does not apply to geostationary satellites. Indeed, only one satellite can benefit from this gravitational balance of forces, mentioned in the section "The Logic of the Geostationary Satellites Contradicting Copernicus – Part I". All other geostationary satellites can no longer be in a stable equilibrium point, simultaneously. The alternative is to force this geostationary equilibrium, using appropriate technology for that.

Thus, pro-Copernicus scientists may counter-argue that the functioning of the geostationary satellites may be compatible with Copernicus's ideas about the Earth's rotation around its axis in 24 hours to produce the "day-night" effect and with the 28-day lunar cycle.

God said that the Moon has been static since the sinking of Atlantis, and that geostationary satellites cannot rely on the Moon's gravity to maintain the equilibrium. It is God, therefore, who allows them to be in geostationary equilibrium, in orbit around the planet Earth. The experts' version is therefore similar, but without mentioning God, as usual.

But the anti-Copernican reasoning of the previous section can still evolve positively. Lunar cycles of ~28 days can be produced in two different ways:

With the Earth static and the Moon revolving around the Earth in orbits of ~28 days (and the Sun revolving around the Earth, in circular orbits of 24 hours), as in the time of Enoch of the Bible.

With the Moon static, the Earth revolving around its axis in cycles of ~28 days (and the Sun revolving around the Earth, in circular orbits of 24 hours), as has been the case, since the time of Moses, after the sinking of Atlantis.

Indeed, these are the only possible alternative movements to produce lunar cycles of approximately 28 days, imposing correct coherence, simultaneously, with the tendency of clouds to move eastward and with the 24-hour "day-night" effect.

Assuming Copernicus's followers are correct, then the Earth moves around its axis in 24 hours, producing the "day-night" effect. But in this case, a lunar cycle also occurs in ~24 hours, with the Moon either static or revolving around the Earth in 28-day cycles, and this is a contradiction. The Lunar cycles last ~28 days, not ~24 hours. Indeed:

If the Moon is stationary and the Earth rotates 360°, around its axis, in 24 hours, this also produces a lunar cycle in 24 hours.
If the Moon revolves around the Earth in cycles of ~28 days, then the Moon rotates ~360°/28 = ~13° per day, but the Earth rotates 360° around its axis in the same 24 hours, and this again produces a lunar cycle of ~24 hours, since the Moon's movement is relatively small in these 24 hours (~13° of the lunar orbital circumference).

Therefore, the most coherent explanation for the lunar cycles, the "day-night" effect, and the eastward displacement of clouds, approximately 13°/day, is the one mentioned in this book by the pro-God, anti-Copernican movement: the Earth rotates around its axis, in cycles of ~28 days, the Sun revolves around the Earth in circular orbits of ~24 hours and the Moon remains static, since the time of Moses, after the sinking of Atlantis.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Is It Possible, for a Star, To Fall on Earth, from the Sky, as Rev 8:10-11 Says?

According to Rev 8:10-11, a Star from Heaven falls to Earth, onto the waters. The relevant passage follows (source: Vatican Online Bible):

10 When the third angel blew his trumpet, a large star burning like a torch fell from the sky. It fell on a third of the rivers and on the springs of water.

11 The star was called "Wormwood", and a third of all the water turned to wormwood. Many people died from this water, because it was made bitter.

Normally, we might think this is not possible, because we were taught in school that stars are very big—such as the Sun. For example, the BBC scientific Web page "This is how many Earths could fit in the Sun", at https://skyatnightmagazine.com, confirms that the Sun is approximately 1.3 × 10⁶ times larger than Earth in volume.

However, God said that Sun and Moon are approximately the same size, and their distance from Earth is also roughly the same. Yet, this is hard to prove: even with a telescope, we can only observe that Sun and Moon appear to be the same size, and it's not easy to determine their actual size or distance from the Earth.

The same applies to the remaining planets of the Solar System—they may exist, or they may not, and not necessarily in the way we were taught in school or in astronomy books. Indeed, this kind of knowledge is not easily verifiable... it's unproven.

However, small stars do exist! And modern science doesn't deny that. E.g., in the article on stars at https://www.space.com, it's acknowledged that some stars have a diameter of only 20 Km.

Thus, Rev 8:10-11 could indeed happen—literally.

"... And a part of the waters becomes wormwood, during the apocalyptic period..."

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Curiosities.

Earth Flat or Round? Four Corners?

Example 1: Does the Earth have Four Corners?

The Earth does indeed have four corners, while still being approximately spherical: Alaska, Eastern Siberia (in the Bering Strait), and, southwards, Tierra del Fuego and New Zealand. There's, therefore, no contradiction.

The four corners, in the sense of the four extremities of the Earth, are mentioned, for instance, in Rev 20:8 or Job 38:13.

Please note that this notion of "four corners" can easily be misunderstood—leading to ideas of a flat or rectangular Earth, as happened in the past.

I think that this article was inspired by God...

Example 2: The Vault or the Circle of the Earth?

If we take a good interpretation of Isaiah 40:22, using the Vatican Bible, we could have known more than 2,000 years ago that the Earth was approximately spherical:

"He sits enthroned above the vault of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers."

But be careful, other Bibles say:

"He who sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, the inhabitants of which are like grasshoppers."

A vault or sphere necessarily includes circles on its surface, but the evil interpretation easily leads to misinterpretations, contradictions, and flat Earth theories. A good old Bible before 1966 uses the correct word: "globe", in the sense of a 'vault' or a 'sphere'—not a flat Earth.

I think that this article was inspired by God...

Israel, the Navel of the Earth?

According to Ez 38:12, Israel is located at the navel (or center) of the Earth, at the time of the war of Gog and Magog:

Ez 38:12: "You will come to plunder and loot and turn your might against the ruins they live in, against this people gathered back from the nations, these stock-breeders and traders who live at the Navel of the World."

We assume Jerusalem, the holy city, as the reference. If we take the four diagonals from the four corners of the world (please refer to the previous section concerning the four corners of the world), and use the correct scale, indeed they cross not far from the region of Israel/Jerusalem—giving already an idea of the geographical center of the world.

The best method would be to compute the mass/geographical center using the correct scale, but it is difficult to compute.

Ezekiel knew that Jerusalem was the navel or center of the Earth already some 2600 years ago.

I think that this article was inspired by God...

Has the Earth Pillars?

Job 9:6 says:

"He shakes the Earth out of its place, and the pillars beneath it tremble."

According to my Bible of Jerusalem, the pillars are not supporting the planet Earth in the “vacuum”, but are rather the magma pillars that sustain the Earth's surface.

Yes, we have to be very careful with interpretations, especially when science and the Bible seem to oppose each other, because bad interpretations may lead us, believers, to fall easily into the ridicule...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Is the Universe in Expansion?

Maybe. Or maybe not also. Science affirms that the universe is in expansion, but the truth is that an ordinary person cannot easily prove that—nor can they easily contradict it.

Only professionals in the domain might be able to, and even then, perhaps not completely.

It could also be a lie. It may be true, but the professionals must prove it, and that simply hasn’t happened for the general public.

This is not a neutral matter, because the supposed expansion speed of the universe combined with the distance* from the extremities of the universe (in expansion) to the center of the given universe sphere, can be used to calculate the fake date of the Big Bang—the fake great explosion, supposedly~14 billion years ago— using a simple mathematical/physical formula, as simple as the speed formula:

speed = distance (traveled) / time.

* - the distance, thus, the ray of the universe sphere mass; in practice, the distance from the Earth, the center of the visible Universe, to the limits of the visible Universe or, either, a (theoretical) simulation of the ray of the Universe (sphere mass).

And that fake scientific date of ~14 billion years contradicts the biblical account of the fourth day of creation, near 6,100 years ago.

Thus, it attacks the reputation of the Bible as source of truths.

The Bible should be true in the scientific domain as well, because the it is sacred and, therefore, is supposed to tell the truth.

Another consequence is that many people in the West no longer believe literally in the creation in seven days, largely due to the prestige, credibility, and reputation of science in fields like the creation of the universe—with the theory of the Big Bang and the claim that the universe is expanding.

What I see at night, when looking at a normal clear sky, is that the universe does not seem to be expanding, but rather relatively stable, especially the visible stars.

They may move, but very slowly; they seem static, and those movements can only be noticed, after hours or days observing the same star—except in some rare cases.

I'm not a professional in the domain, but I no longer believe so easily in the scientific claim that the universe is in expansion, because when I observe the sky at night (under normal clear conditions), it seems relatively static, and not as though the visible stars are moving away from each other with time.

It may be true, but that must be proven, and the average person does not have that proof.

It may also be a scientific lie, one in which evil forces won, and later, the truth became a “job secret”. The honest scientist who dares to reveal it could risk both reputation and misfortune.

Communicating to the press is also ineffective, because even in the West, the official news are also controlled by lobbies that are not necessarily pro-God. As a result, the scientific lie remains as it is.

Still, it may also be true. The reality is that the normal person lacks the means to prove it.

Ordinary people can only believe—and that, in itself, is somewhat naive, because 'science' is a tool both for good and evil. According to the Bible, it serves both.

On the other hand, when we look up at the sky at night, what we see is half the sphere of the visible universe—where the center of that universe is simply the Earth.

Using a telescope should not change much our perception of the relatively static universe: the radius of the visible universe would appear greater, and we could see more celestial bodies, larger and in greater detail.

Thus, hard to prove that the universe is expanding.

And science should be the one to provide that proof—because otherwise, it is may just be another scientific lie, in order to support the fake Big Bang dates that contradict the Bible.

That is why I believe the universe is not in expansion.

However, we could accept that the universe is expanding, as science claims—if science can provide solid proof, and not only just theories.

But in that case, science cannot legitimately claim that the universe has been expanding for 14 billion years.

If God created the universe and its natural laws around 6,100 years ago—as stated in Genesis—then, even if expansion was one of those laws, it could only have been occurring for the last ~6,100 years, not for ~14,000,000,000 years.

According to the divine revelations, including those in the New Testament of the Bible, heaven (e.g., God, St Paul) keeps claiming that the universe was created on the fourth day, and Adam on the sixth, just as the Genesis account says. See, for instance, in French, http://vincentdetarle.free.fr.

God doesn't lie... but science may lie—or at least promote inaccurate theories in various domains.

More details on this subject can be found in the scientific chapters of www.christianideas.eu.

The Universe is not in expansion, said God.

The celestial bodies follow their trajectories, for example, the Sun moves around the Earth in circular orbits, according to the laws of the nature, and that's all.

Please note that we cannot use a formula like speed = distance/time to calculate the date of the Big Bang, because we cannot access the center of the universe or its outer limits, as far as I know. Everything remains theoretical—mere simulations.

More details are available in the astronomical sections of this chapter.

I believe that this article was inspired by God...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Are the Continents in Displacement?

Maybe. Or maybe not. And the reasoning is similar to that of the previous subject, 'the universe is in expansion’—it again involves speeds and distances, but now in the scientific field of geology and the theory of continental drift.

According to this theory, the continents are slowly moving, each year shifting by 1 or several centimeters in a given direction.

But the normal person cannot prove this, only believe it.

It may be true also, but if so, the professionals on the field should provide concrete prove.

Normally, such proof doesn't exist, because it remains a scientific theory, not a scientific fact.

Just like with the Big Bang theory, many elements of the theory remain unproven. That's why they're called theories, and not facts.

It's naive to blindly believe scientific claims that are not easily proven—especially since scientific deception is also possible, particularly in fields the average person cannot verify.

These supposed small movements of the continents each year could be used to give a sense of coherence to the fake scientific timelines, in order to contradict, with success, the biblical account of the creation of the world in seven days.

For example, to support scientific timeline, we assume the universe was created around 14 billion years ago. Then, based on simulated calculations, science could propose that the continents separated around of 200 million years ago, such as the spitting of the South American (Brazilian) coast from the African equatorial coast.

This could be a convenient strategy for the pro-evil lobby, which fights to attack the reputation of the biblical dates in this domain.

Having the estimated date of ~200 millions of years ago and the distance between the African Equatorial coast and the Brazilian coast, it's relatively easy to calculate how many centimeters per year South America would need to move away from Africa.

So, maybe it's true, but maybe it's false.

God says that such displacements of the continents do not exist. However, the theory of the tectonic plates as the cause of Earthquakes is true.

This article is inspired by God.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Proofs that Diseases Are Caused by Discreet Witchcraft (Second Cause, in Parallel, but Hidden).

Please refer to the section 'Torrefied COFFEE to UNMASK Discreet WITCHCRAFT behind LUNG CANCERS', of the Chapter 'Rich, Masonry, Opus Dei'.

Why Are Most of the Contagions by Flu Caused by Discreet Witchcraft?

Caution should be exercised when accepting traditional medical theories about health problems and its causing agents, because the majority of health problems seems to be caused by discreet witchcraft. For more details, see the section ‘Health Problems Caused by Witchcraft in Secret’, in the chapter 'Rich, Freemasons, Opus Dei'.

A closer analysis of flu-type contagion reveals that contagion through airborne microbes should hardly happen—except, possibly, in cases of windstorms.

Why is that?

Because people are typically upright. An infected person with the flu, who is not lying in bed or on a couch/chair, is usually in vertical position.

This means that the air, in order to breath normally, enters or exits through the nose in a nearly vertical direction (up or down), or through the mouth in a mostly horizontal direction.

However, microbes responsible for infections infections are much heavier. For example, a small virus may weigh 10^-17 grams while 10²³ molecules of Nitrogen weighs 28g. For more information please refer to, e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org, 'Orders of magnitude (mass)'.

Because of their weight, these microbes tend to perform a parabolic. When expelled from the mouth, their trajectory starts off nearly horizontal and then becomes progressively more vertical, due to gravity.

Therefore, in the absence of wind, an infected person expels microbes through the nose, and these microbes fall straight downward—at least if the person is upright.

They fall in the ground and are unlikely to infect others in daily scenarios like being in a car, public transport, at work, at school, etc.

If the person cannot breath adequately through the nose and uses the mouth instead, the expelled microbes initially travel horizontally but fall quickly in a parabolic trajectory—within 2 or 3 centimeters according to the Lord—because of gravity.

Again, in normal environments without wind, this means they don’t infect others.

There are exceptions—for instance, a kiss in the mouth. In such cases, direct transmission could occur.

In the presence of wind, for example horizontal air movement, microbes expelled by an infected person could be carried further along the horizontal axis before falling.

When expelled from the nose, they should still follow a somewhat vertical trajectory, due to the physiognomy of the nose in an upright position, and reach the ground approximately 20 to 30 cm away from the initial position (the nose) measured in the horizontal axis. In practice, this kind of contagion rarely occurs. However, in presence of crowds (at festivals, etc.), in open areas, some contagion could happen.

In the second case, with horizontal winds, expelling microbes through the mouth would result in a wider parabola—the trajectory starting nearly horizontal from the mouth, then gradually curving and becoming more vertical due to the effect of gravity, while still retaining a horizontal component due to the wind. After about 70 to 150 cm, measured along the horizontal axis, the microbes would reach the ground.

In such cases, some contagion could occur between an infected adult and a child, or between two people whose heights differ by more than 40 cm—and only in such of cases.

If the infected person is lying in bed in a horizontal position, facing upward, then, if they expel microbes through the nose, these would follow a parabolic trajectory, departing from the nose in a nearly horizontal path, and falling shortly thereafter, near the chin. The same reasoning applies to other lying positions when breathing through the nose.

If the infected person lies in bed in a horizontal position, belly up, and expels microbes through the mouth, then the microbes rise briefly and return almost immediately to the mouth due to the effect of gravity. The reasoning for other lying positions, when breathing through the mouth, is similar.

Thus, the chances of an infected person spreading the disease to others are relatively small.

However, there are a few situations where contagion could still occur: groups of students from different classes outdoors in the presence of wind—kissing on the mouth, or touching the mouth with hands previously contaminated with microbes.

Therefore, the chances of a person infected with the flu spreading the illness to others are relatively small.

Contagion, however, could indeed happen through sexual contact if one person is infected.

What normally happens is something else: a person becomes infected with the flu (or a similar illness), and that person is discreetly observed by one or more witches who monitor the people in the neighborhood. They choose a new victim to make ill as well, for example, about 24 hours later, through the use of witchcraft, which causes the flu—microbes included.

Because there is some possibility of transmission involving microbes, people become confused and accept the theory that flu is normally spread through the air.

This is possible, but the probability of it happening is relatively low.

Please note that microbes are larger than air particles or molecules and therefore more affected by gravity.

Air particles, such as nitrogen or oxygen, are also affected by gravity, but something else occurs: these molecules are abundant in the air, similar to many boxes being placed continuously side by side and then stacked one on the top of other, without interruption.

That's why people are able to breathe successfully, and why not all oxygen molecules settle near the ground due to gravity.

As gases, these particles move or flow relatively easily, allowing microbes and other heavier bodies to fall due to the effect gravity.

This section is also inspired by God.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Why Are Most of the Smells Caused by Discreet Witchcraft? Over Dirtiness

Because odor particles are heavier than air—namely heavier that oxygen (O₂) and the nitrogen (N₂)—they should, under normal circumstances, quickly fall to the ground due to the effect of gravity.

A natural smell is that of the roses: you must place your nose close to the flowers in order to perceive the perfume...

This is the normal behavior according to the laws of nature. Odor particles, like microbes and smoke, are too heavy to rise under normal circumstances due to gravity. This rising effect may happen, yes, but under such conditions it no longer follow the laws of nature—especially in the absence of strong winds or heat.

An careful analysis of household dirtiness should lead one to conclude that it appears "discreetly", through a form of 'subtle universal discreet witchcraft'. The test to verify is relatively easy to perform: choose a part of the house, like an empty bedroom, for the experiment.

It should be enough to keep it closed, as one would with a cupboard, for about two weeks.

However, the test to be done is exactly the opposite: you should open the window every day for about five minutes—but only slightly, if possible using the modern windows that open upwards.

In practice, you should visit that room every day and open a bit the window each time. This procedure is necessary to "confuse" the origin of the dirtiness: there is always the possibility that the dirtiness comes from the shoes (indoors), or from the air entering through the open windows.

People usually get confused about this: maybe the dirt comes from the shoes, the children, or the opened windows...

But the truth is that, such dirtiness generally comes neither from shoes (in urban settings), nor from children, nor from the outside—especially in the absence of winds, which is the case when a window is only slightly open and the opening is directed upwards.

In practice, the dirtiness from the soles of the shoes doesn't exist, or it is left in the entry of the building before reaching the apartment door. This can be observed. It may happen on rainy days or in rural settings, but it generally doesn’t happen in urban areas.

The doormat at the building’s entrance is usually enough to clean the soles of the shoes properly.

What normally happens is that the specific room becomes 'spontaneously' dirty after one or two weeks without adequate cleaning services.

And it shouldn't. Since the room remained mostly closed, such dirtiness should not appear in a normal, natural way.

It came, then, from nothing, through "discreet universal witchcraft for dirtiness". In God’s paradise witchcraft no longer exists.

Therefore, people there no longer suffer from upsetting bad smells, nor do they have to waste time, cleaning persistent the dirtiness, such as at home.

More details on this kind of subject are found in the section 'Why Are the Contagions By Flus Caused by Discreet Witchcraft?' of this chapter.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Is the Theory of the Relativity True, With Stars Moving at Speeds Three Times Faster Than the Speed of Light?

No. Because the Theory of Relativity claims that if a body moves, at the speed of light, its mass becomes infinite. But in practice, this doesn't normally happen in the universe.

Thus, it would be impossible for stars to move at the speed of light—or three times that speed—according to Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, without acquiring infinite mass.

I read in a scientific article that stars were observed moving away from each other at speeds three times faster than the speed of the light, in opposite directions. But maybe the professionals in these scientific domains are correct, and it's not a scientific lie.

In that case, however, they must provide proof.

In the case of the Theory of Relativity, some elements simply cannot be proven: it is a scientific theory and not a scientific fact.

We should no longer so easily believe in unproven science, because it may be also involve scientific falsehoods—especially in areas difficult to verify for the average person.

It is also possible that the stars do not, in fact, move away from each other at three times the speed of light, but only at sub-light speeds, in order not to contradict the Theory of Relativity.

Or perhaps they do move at faster-than-light speeds, and the Theory of Relativity—or parts of it—contain scientific lies that are difficult to verify for most people.

In this domain, the fault lies with the Theory of the Relativity, said God. Therefore, stars can move at speeds higher than the speed of the light, and their mass doesn't become infinite.

Theory of Relativity, Part 2: Curve Space-Time or Cartesian Coordinate System (3D) for Space?

The correct answer, according to the news from Heaven, is the Cartesian Coordinate System 3D for space. God confirms this as well. Thus, the Theory of Relativity is also wrong here.

Indeed, in the Messages from Heaven at www.tldm.org, it is said that Paradise is located beyond the farthest star from the Universe (mass). Please refer to www.tldm.org, 'Directives from Heaven', 'Eternity'.

This could mean that, beyond the mass of the Universe mass, there is the Paradise—covering completely the Universe’s mass in all directions, from its outermost limits to infinity.

What I mean is this: whether you are in Belgium or Australia (on the opposite side of the Earth), Paradise is located, in the "up" direction in both locations—very far away, beyond the extremities of the Universe’s mass (the farthest star in that upward direction).

If you simulate the whole Universe’s mass, as a "sphere", with Earth inside it, you will understand this better.

This means that Paradise is still located within 3D Space and not in a fifth dimension, as might otherwise be expected.

Indeed, according to the Bible, Paradise may not be located in a fifth dimension, because at the time of the Ascension, Jesus rose in the direction of Heaven—He ascended (upwards).

The Bible and and the Apostles’ Creed confirm this: He descended into Hell (literally) and He Ascended into Heaven (literally). Please refer to, e.g., Wikipedia, "Apostles' Creed".

The fact that Paradise is located after the farthest stars, in every direction also means that teleportation exists; otherwise Our Lady could not easily travel from Paradise to Lourdes or to Medjugorje.

The idea that Paradise is located beyond the limits of the Universe’s mass aligns spontaneously with the hypothesis that the space is infinite that we can correctly use a 3D Cartesian Coordinate System for calculations in three-dimensional space.

I cannot prove this, but God confirms it. Therefore, Einstein’s (hard-to-understand) theory of over curved space-time is false.

This section was inspired by God.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Considerations on Matter and Antimatter, Black Holes, the Birth and Death of Stars.

Where is the Antimatter Hidden in the Universe?

As far as I know, only small quantities of antimatter have been observed by scientists in the (visible) Universe. Please refer to, e.g., www.space.com.

What I believe is that God used the formula:

Energy = matter + antimatter

to create the Cosmos, and He still uses it to create, for example, new stars.

For instances, when God created the Solar System—with the Sun and all the other planets orbiting around the Earth—He also created a Black Hole (in the neighborhood of the Solar System, but not visible from Earth) and an anti-Solar System (anti-Sun, anti-Earth, etc.) at the same time.

The Anti Solar System then moved away from the Solar System in the direction of the mentioned Black Hole.

Afterwards, the anti-Sun and the anti-planets of the anti-Solar System entered inside that Black Hole, as if they were being consumed by it...

But they were not eaten by the Black Hole—they simply crossed it into another location in the Universe. The antimatter thus became hidden from people on Earth.

The principle of star creation is more or less the same.

If God sees energy somewhere in the Universe, He may decide to create something new—such as a star (and its corresponding anti-star and Black Hole). He creates all three simultaneously, and two stars appear from that energy—a star and the anti-star.

The anti-star moves away from its corresponding star; in fact, both move away from each other in opposite directions.

But the anti-star moves in the direction of the given Black Hole also until it crosses to another location in the Universe, invisible from Earth—thus hidden.

It appears as though the (anti-)star has been eaten by the Black Hole. What remains visible (from that perspective) is the newly created star and the respective Black Hole—both seemingly created from nothing.

I believe this article was inspired by God...

Why Are There So Few Side Effects from the COVID Vaccines?

I believe that Jesus is right and these COVID vaccines are indeed dangerous, and normally, people should experience secondary effects—or even die—after a few years of receiving the COVID shots.

Currently, it does seem that a few persons have suffered adverse reactions to the vaccines, but most appear to be OK. How can we explain this contradiction?

What I believe happened is this: Jesus is not a liar, but in order to try to mask or cancel the negative side effects of the COVID vaccines, there is ongoing witchcraft being performed. In this way, the adverse effects are not visible and "everything" seems to be fine.

God hates witchcraft, but He also has pity for the vaccinated. This article was inspired by God.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Science Cannot Properly Explain How Cows Produce Milk

Science cannot properly explain how cows produce milk. That milk comes from the fat cells (and/or the blood), which normally shouldn't produce milk.

Herbivores such as cows and sheep traditionally consume only plants. The nutritional composition of those plants is mainly cellulose—fibers hat are typically indigestible, but which help with the intestinal transit—and herb juice.

In practice, such herbs provide little energy elements or proteins.

These herbivores can indeed obtain proteins and other nutrients through microbial activity in the stomach, but that is not the normal rute (reference: e.g., malenyblackangusbeef.com.au).

This grass fermentation process in a ruminant's stomach happens relatively quickly (within ~ 1 hour) and cannot be replicated outside the ruminant's stomach. It generally occurs in the presence of oxygen, indicating that it takes place through subtle divine intervention, not through typical anaerobic fermentation which is slower.

The Bible says that after the Apocalypse, the lion will no longer be carnivorous, but will eat grass like the sheep. This implies that the herb fermentation process of ruminants shalllater be applied to lions.

However, grass does not need to return to the mouths of lions or ruminants for fermentation to occur. Vomiting exists but doesn't happen frequently.

Milk production from cows, sheep, and other female mammals in general, normally shouldn't occur in nature. Milk comes from the breast of the female animal (mother,) and normally, fat cells should only produce fat. Blood might provide blood or lymph, but not milk, which has a completely different chemical composition.

This cannot be explained in the conventional scientific way. It occurs through Divine intervention.

This section was inspired by God.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

What About the Galaxies?

Galaxies should normally not exist either. But why?

Very simple: when we could still look at the stars in the clear night sky, we could notice that the stars where relatively stable and grouped into constellations—but we could not see those spirals of stars named galaxies.

The use of powerful telescopes should not have changed this scenario significantly. By using them, we should simply be able to see farther into the Universe—larger and more detail.

The small stars that we observed before (without a telescope) should now appear bigger (like the Sun or even bigger, during daytime), and we should also be able to see more stars (smaller and farther away), but the overall scenario should remain similar to what we observed before, without the help of telescopes.

Even with less powerful telescopes, we should still be able to see the always-visible stars (under clear sky, also without telescopes), now somewhat bigger, like suns (although we should avoid looking directly at the Sun).

The sky should remain full of constellations—just as we see it without a telescope—but with larger stars, plus additional smaller stars that are now visible. Therefore, those spirals/galaxies, as science calls them—should not appear in the Universe.

This section was inspired by God.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Why Does CO₂ Increase So Little Despite the "Publicity"?

Officially, CO₂ emissions have increased significantly.

The "climate change" narrative is being promoted in order to make the developed countries pay heavily to reduce CO₂ emissions, thereby weakening the financial independence of still free nations such as the USA. Please refer to the Messages from Jesus to John Leary, over 'Climate Change', at https://johnleary.com/...

Normally, the official data on CO₂ emissions are correct (since the Industrial Revolution), but the explanation behind it is somewhat different.

Since the molecular mass of the CO₂, (~44 g/mol), is heavier than that of air (~ 29 g/mol), emission should fall to the ground due to gravity rather than rise into the atmosphere —except briefly due to thermal effects, such as when expelled from a factory, at high temperatures.

Other carbon emissions—specifically carbon aggregates—often appear in the form smoke or carbonized/burnt particles. Some of these may rise (like water vapor, carbon monoxide, or methane), but other should fall, such as tar, carbon black, or nicotine particles, because they're heavier than air after cooling.

Please note that the molar mass of Carbon is 12 g.mol^-1, but the generic molecular structure of Carbon Black is composed of Carbon hexagons bonded to other atoms, which makes its molar molecular mass much higher (it is an aggregate of Carbon...).

Carbonized particles, are heavier than air and may be a common product of human Carbon emissions. Reference: e.g., Wikipedia, 'Carbon black'.

After cooling, they should go quickly to the ground.

In practice, both CO₂ and carbonized particles, being heavier than air, should quickly fall to the ground rather than pollute the atmosphere.

What could remain in the atmosphere are: water vapor (to ignore), carbon monoxide, and methane—gases lighter than air.

But the central concern regarding carbon emissions focuses on CO₂—a contradiction!

These emissions exist, and the official data may be correct (since the Industrial Revolution), but what should happen is different: CO₂ rises briefly due to the thermic effect, before cooling and returning quickly to the ground.

Indeed, the official data on atmospheric CO₂ levels (e.g., at: https://www.climate.gov) shows that CO₂ was around 280 parts per million (ppm) in 1760, rose to around 320 ppm by 1965, and continued increasing around 420 ppm by 2024.

It seems enormous, but, in practice, it is not! It's less than 1/1000 (less than 0.1%)!!!

Currently the atmosphere contains only about 0.04% CO₂—421 ppm. Source: e. g., www.climate.gov...

And How Do We Explain This?

Since CO₂ should quickly fall to the ground after cooling, the explanation is more or less aligned with the official narrative: the Industrial Revolution, pollution, and exponential demographic growth (including human and animal emissions, such as respiration).

Normally, CO₂ should disappear quickly by falling to the ground. But people, animals, cars, heating systems, and industries continually produce CO₂, which falls after cooling. In cities, where people live in buildings, these emissions also descend quickly.

Therefore, some residual traces of CO₂ might be detected before they reach the ground. Naturally, these traces have increased by about 25% since 1960. But since then the world's population more than doubled, and the pollution, the human technology, the respiration and the comfort, have contributed a bit to it.

These emissions don't go to the atmosphere, but are rather detected as they fall to the ground. They do not contribute to climate change at all.

There is indeed climate change, but it is due to the misuse of technology, such as the 'HAARP Machine', which can alter weather by pushing Atlantic depressions, normally headed east from the Florida region, further north. This causes warmer and drier conditions in areas around the Mediterranean Sea.

Until the 1960s, such artificial 'climate change' activity didn't exist. Back then Atlantic depressions would move eastward naturally, bringing cooler temperatures and more rainfall to Mediterranean regions.

These depressions still form in the same areas (e.g., Atlantic, near Florida), but now their trajectory is unnaturally diverted northeast. This would not happen if the warming were purely global or planetary in nature.

There's a battle between good and evil, and one can expect reactive behaviors from those aligned with evil. However, historical data and clear correlations can serve as evidence to counter such manipulations.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Why Do We Feel Colder Indoors (Compared to Outside) at around 22 °C?

We often overlook this, but the truth is: when it’s colder outside, we usually don't feel as cold as we do indoors at the same temperature.

You may check this yourself: during summer evening temperatures of 22 °C are common, and light clothing is perfectly adequate.

That means: at 22°C outdoors (not 37°C, as it would be "expected"), we enjoy spring and summer days, light clothes are enough, with such temperatures.

But indoors—at home or in the office—with the same temperature of 22 °C, the sensation is different. To sleep or work comfortably, we need blankets, heating, or winter clothing (pullovers, jackets, etc.).

This a contradiction! And why?

If 22°C outdoors allows us to wear only light summer clothes—as a light T-shirt and a light summer jacket—then indoors, at the same temperature, we should also be comfortable wearing the same summer light clothes, light pajamas or sleeping with light bed clothes only (as light bed sheets).

But in practice, that’s not the case!

Home temperatures of 22°C are only comfortable if we wear winter clothes, like a pullover, and use thick blankets for sleep.

Yet, during summer, 22°C represents the minimum temperatures of so-called 'tropical nights', when light summer clothes suffice outside, even at night.

At around 16°C indoors, we already feel cold!

Such temperatures are generally considered too cold for office environments, not allowing to work properly.

Those are typical indoor temperatures during winter, which require either thick winter clothes or adequate heating systems to increase the indoor temperature to around 19-23°C.

Even so then, in heated rooms, we still need sweaters, jackets, or extra blankets to feel truly comfortable at that level—at home or at the office.

These contradictory sensations with respect to temperatures are not normal, even if they "seem" to be.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

And How Can We Explain This Contradiction in Cold Temperature Sensations?

The explanation is similar to others presented in www.christianideas.eu, in the section 'Christian Ideas and Discernment' and 'Ideas for Catholic Russia Converted', made in Belgium: discreet, powerful witchcraft may be used to induce the sensation of "cold" in homes or offices.

But what's the goal? Why Does this happen?

The purpose of such 'feel colder' discreet witchcraft may be twofold:

Revenge against the targeted individuals: they are compelled buy and use winter clothing, even when indoor temperatures are significantly higher (by about 8°C-15°C) than those outside.

For example, in Brussels in late February 2024, outdoor afternoon temperatures may be around 9°C, while indoor could reach 22°C. Yet winter clothing might still be required inside.
To promote sales and consumption of services and products related to cold weather—such as winter clothing, blankets, and heating (energy/gas/electricity).

In this context, those practicing this discreet such witchcraft might claim they are subtly defending certain economic and professional interests.

That seems to be the explanation—otherwise we face a contradiction! I'm sorry...

Still, the best is to be prepared with winter clothing and / or to activate heating systems during the winter season.

Are there better alternatives? Perhaps not. Heating systems may fail, after all. It’s better to be cautious.

It's not overly dramatic, but it does imply additional energy costs tied to colder temperatures during winter.

Even the cold sensations experienced during the flu of fever might be explained similarly. The principle is the same: a discreet punishment, applied cunning, while also benefiting relevant professionals—such as the pharmaceutical and healthcare industries.

For alternative ideas against flu, see the chapter 'Protections against Evil' on www.christianideas.eu.

Evidence that 'diseases/health problems are caused/promoted by discreet ruse witchcraft' can be found in the related section from the chapter 'Rich, freemasons'.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Modern Science Eventually Used for Evil As Well

There's a danger of apocalypse, it comes unexpected. More on this topic is found in the chapter 'Danger of Apocalypse'.

The Book of Daniel warns us that, in the end times knowledge will greatly increase—but also will evil.

We're living in a dangerous period; danger of apocalypse. As knowledge expands, so does potential for evil.

Science, too, can be used to serve evil purposes.

In the scientific chapters of this book and website, ‘Mysteries of the Bible Revealed, Christian Ideas and Discernment’ (www.christianideas.eu), we see that several scientific theories may contain significant errors: the theory of evolution, long scientific dates, the Big Bang theory, continental drift, the theory of relativity, the heliocentric mode (theories about the movements of the Sun and Earth).

Some of this scientific theories contradict directly the scientific teachings of the Bible, and may be used to confuse people, weaken their faith, and discredit the Bible’s authority in scientific matters.

Some News from Heaven and www.christianideas.eu explain that the Bible is correct in the scientific domains.

But other fields of science may also be used in the service of evil:

Abortion technologies, contraceptives, and sex-change surgeries—these technologies, products and services often support or enable deadly sins.
Apocalyptic payment technology—such as the implanted chip 666 in the body—may be used to create the zombies of the apocalypse. More on this can be found in the chapter 'Danger of Apocalypse'.
Technological products as laptops, smartphones, phones (fixed or mobile), watches, chip cards...

These can potentially be used for discreet espionage, posing threats to privacy. Telecommunications, sounds, and video can be permanently recorded and secretly sent to several entities. The geographical location of a device (e.g., smartphone, watch, laptop) may also be permanently tracked and shared. In addition, discreet spyware and remote control software may be installed, enabling cover surveillance. As a result we may eventually face less privacy... and fewer freedoms?

Internet of Things: This technology could enhance apocalyptic systems, such as body-implanted chip 666, mandatory for making payments. A person implanted with such a chip—effectively a zombie—could be assigned an IP address. Internet of things may be also used for discreet spy activities, like an intelligent fridge with discreet camera and IP, sending information for spying purposes.
Satellite Technology: Satellites may be used for tracking the geographical position of electronic and technological devices. It may also be used for surveillance purposes, enabling the detection of the location of a smartphone and / or a zombie person implanted with the chip 666. Satellites also may facilitate wireless communication.

Wireless technologies (e.g., smartphones): these systems can communicate with electronic devices, compatible with 'internet for things' and IP addresses. Their use is also adequate for the apocalyptic zombies, with their implanted 666 chip. The zombies may communicate wirelessly, using the chips to pay—thus enabling constant tracking and surveillance.
Nanotechnologies:
- These could be used for discreetly surveillance of privacy, through the placement of nanocameras and GPS nanosensors, inside the watch, ID chip cards, etc.
- They may be used to help to create deadly epidemics, e. g., a virus of lab of the type 'Ebola'.
- They may be used to help create deadly epidemics, e.g., a laboratory-created virus similar to 'Ebola', a possible successor to COVID.
- They may be used to create apocalyptic nanochips 666 for the body, although they may be too small. However, they could, be used to embed nanocameras and GPS nanosensors inside the apocalyptic chip 666.
- They may be used to develop new vaccines—not recommended—for the flu, COVID, the successor of the COVID, etc.
Modern vaccine technologies: not recommended, according to Heaven. Modern vaccines are now to be avoided, said God. Alternative ideas are presented in the chapter 'Protections against Evil'.
Artificial intelligence: it may be used to enhance cross-checking of the information, allowing better control and access, potentially leading to faster and more detailed data collection of individuals—for instance, more accurate tracking of private life. This may ultimately serve evil interests (e.g., fewer freedoms). Artificial intelligence could discreetly be used (e.g., via probability analysis) in the service of evil.

Saint Paul, from heaven, gave an example of the apocalyptic, pro-evil use of artificial intelligence, in https://messages-du-ciel.com/, in the message of 8.6.2025, in French.
Geo-climatic "secret" weapons, such as the HAARP machine or similar, may be used to produce climate change effects, as well as artificial geological and meteorological catastrophes: volcanoes, Earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, floods, storms, rising temperatures... toxic, indeed. Nature should be respected, and artificial catastrophes should not be created (although difficult to prove). Once again, science (combined with hidden witchcraft) may be used discreetly in the service of evil...
...

Thus, knowledge increases dramatically, and new technologies seem to be promising us tools for apocalyptic use.

The apocalyptic biblical Book of Daniel seems to be accurate: knowledge increases, and so does evil, benefiting more than good from this knowledge.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Swimming, as a Discreet Miracle

God says that swimming is a (discreet) miracle. I understand it like this: if the human body sinks sometimes, it should always sink. But that doesn't happen, when we learn swimming or floating techniques. A stone may be quite small, and it sinks... wood may be heavy, even in vertical position, and it floats...

In fact, when a wooden boat fills with water in a shipwreck, it sinks; in fact, the submerged wood should still return to the surface of the water, according to the principle of the buoyancy, but this no longer happens. The boat sinks. If God so decides, God stops supporting the boat and it sinks.

This section was inspired by God.

Argumentation That Contact Lenses Permanently in the Eyes Don't Necessarily Cause Blindness

Scientific experts say, that if contact lenses remain permanently in the eyes for more than six months, they cause blindness because there's not enough oxygen in the eyes/iris, and the eyes need to breathe.

To counter this argument, we may note that the fetus remains approximately nine months in the mother’s womb, inside the amniotic fluid, usually with the eyes closed.

The amniotic fluid contains 0.3 mg O₂ L^-1 (source: e.g., French Wikipedia, 'Liquide amniotique')), and with eyes open, the fetus is in permanent contact with the liquid. Otherwise, the eyes may remain closed for about six months or even more: the baby’s eyes are formed about three weeks after conception, according to, e.g., www.yogadesyeux.com (in French) and the fetus’s eyelids are formed around ten weeks after conception, according to, e.g., stedmundseyehospital.com. This all happens before the end of the first trimester.

According to www.quora.com and www.aqua-calc.com, air contains approximately 1.429 g O₂ per liter. This means that the rate oxygen concentration in the amniotic fluid is about 5.000 times lower than that of the air we breathe.

Despite this, the skin and eyes of the newborn baby are normally healthy, even after having been in contact, with much lower smaller oxygen levels during the first nine months, after conception.

On the other hand, a person wearing contact lenses has some humidity (water?) between the iris and the lenses. Why?

Otherwise, the surface of the eye would be dry, and the contact lens could fall out more easily. In fact, if you touch your eye near the Iris (with the eye open), you may feel some moisture, and when the contact lens is placed the eye may tear (e.g., each time the lens is correctly inserted). A thin layer of humidity normally exists between the contact lens and the iris.

That moisture also contains some oxygen—similar to, or more than the fetus’s environment. It may contain approximately 9 mg O₂ per liter (of water) at 20°C, according to, e.g., www.sciencedirect.com. This means it contain about 150 times less oxygen than regular air, but about 30 times more oxygen than the amniotic fluid.

Thus, even with the contact lenses not being removed from the eyes on a permanent basis, this oxygenation still exists—and it is about 30 times higher than that of the fetus, in contact with amniotic fluid for approximately eight months.

In practice, even with eyes permanently open, the fetus would be at a 30-times disadvantage compared to someone wearing contact lenses—especially if the person tears up when inserting the lenses correctly.

Please note that babies may keep their eyes nearly permanently closed in the mother’s womb because they're asleep most of the time. Please refer to, e.g.: https://www.healthline.com.

With eyes closed, the amount of oxygen reaching them from the external environment (air, amniotic fluid) is even smaller, because the closed eyelids and eyelashes act as a barrier to outside oxygen. Therefore, the oxygen reaching the eyes may be up to 1,000 times less in such cases.

Just for comparison: with the mouth closed during a dive, no water enters the mouth if we don’t allow it. The eyelids function in a similar way—and even if the new born baby remains nine months with closed eyes, they are usually born healthy and with good vision.

A person with obesity still gets enough oxygen for the entire body. Therefore, he/she has enough oxygen in the blood to supply a normal-sized body as well: the oxygen received through the lungs is enough for that. The oxygen received through the surface of the eye or skin is not necessary for overall oxygenation, except possibly for certain superficial tissues.

On the other hand, the gestation period of a fetus in the mother's womb proves that a person may survive for 7-9 months, with a low oxygen concentration in contact with the eyes or skin—an oxygen level approximately 30 times lower than that of the regular water (which should be comparable to the light humidity beneath contact lenses).

Thus, this blindness said to occur after 6ix months of continuous contact lens use may indeed happen—but likely due of other causes, not from insufficient oxygenation.

Using protections from God, against evilcould be a good idea, such as praying the Rosary attentively every day. More information over this subject can be found in the chapter ‘Protections against Evil’.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

The Fetus Survive in the Womb of the Mother Only Because of a Miracle

The umbilical cord is not enough to allow the fetus to breathe correctly. Why?

With the help of God, I understood. Scientific experts say that the baby receives food and breaths through the umbilical cord. Indeed, something happens. For nutrition, it is sufficient. But it's not enough to breath correctly.

What happens is that the normal shape of the umbilical cord is not a straight line—it contains curves, even several spirals. As a result, the blood loses pressure significantly. Because of this, the blood pressure is no longer sufficient to provide adequate oxygen to the entire body of the fetus in the required time, confirms God. The image of https://fr.wiktionary.org helps illustrate this.

The fetus would normally die of asphyxiation without divine help providing the necessary oxygen in time. This is, therefore, a discreet miracle from God, even if mainstream science refuses to acknowledge supernatural interventions.

Indeed, there is supernatural interventions: for example, the incorruptible, miraculous, stable corpse of St. Padre Pio, which shows the will of God. Doctrine: catholic conservative. Authority: still the Vatican.

More information over this subject can be found in the chapter "Discernment".

Description of the Whole Universe, With the Help of God

God described to me the composition of the universe. It's not complicated at all. It can be observed, with the help of telescopes, and even partially by simply looking at the sky at night. The universe, then, is like this:

The Earth is at the center, with Purgatory near the Earth's surface, and Hell deep inside the core of the Earth.
In the vicinity, we have the Moon and the Sun, roughly the same size and not that far from Earth. The distance from the Sun to the Earth is approximately the same as that from the Moon to the Earth. The Earth rotates around its axis, completing one full rotation in 28 days to align with the Moon’s cycles. The Moon remains static, ever since the times following the fall of Atlantis. The Sun revolves around the Earth in 24-hour cycles and causes the effect of the solstices, as accurate translations of the Bible affirm.
Next is the planet Venus, near the Sun. It orbits around the Earth, just like the Sun.
Then comes the planet Mars, which also orbits the Earth like the Sun and Venus. These planets can be seen with the help of a telescope, in a similar way as we see the Moon.
After that we have the stars called "asteroids" in astronomy! In fact, most "asteroids" are not "asteroids" at all, but stars! The stars also revolve around the Earth.
Then comes Jupiter, the last planet! It also orbits the Earth, just like the rest of the universe (except the Moon).
Beyond that lies the Paradise of God! There are no more planets or stars—only Paradise, continuing infinitely along the 3D Cartesian axes! Devils can reach this realm, as can people who practice witchcraft... but those individuals are generally aligned with evil and are, therefore, not interested in this Paradise. They become confused because they cannot find Saturn. That's why such people complain that, even with luciferian supernatural powers (witchcraft), they cannot reach Saturn. Indeed... that happens because we naively believe everything official astronomy tells us, without verifying it. I too once believed it...

Complete Description of the Universe, with the Help of God.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

More information about the errors in astronomy can be found in the sections 'Bible and Astronomy' of this chapter.

Principle of the Double Cause, in Parallel: The Earth Warmed from the Inside / Kernel / Hell, and Not from The Sun.

God told me that the Earth is not warmed by the Sun, but from the inside—from Hell—again using the principle of the double cause/camouflage, as in most health problems, for the sake of discretion and confusion. More information on the subject ‘Evidence that Diseases are Caused by Witchcraft, as Second Cause, in Parallel’, in the related sections of the chapter 'Rich, Freemasonry, Opus Dei'.

If we're more attentive and/or better informed, we can notice that the thermal cooling effect observed when ascending a mountain is caused by the increasing distance from the extremely hot core of the Earth (i.e., from Hell). Official science implicitly admits some of this—see for example https://www.vedantu.com. It can't be otherwise.

Indeed, if we're far from a major source of heat, the temperature drops, unless there are other nearby sources of heat to offset that effect.

In the case of climbing mountains, the most significant thermal factor is the cooling caused by the increasing distance to the Earth’s extremly hot core—Hell. Please refer, e.g., to Wikipedia’s article on Mount Everest.

In theory, there’s another source of heat, "in the neighborhood": the Sun. We approach the Sun, when ascending, e.g., by climbing a mountain or flying by plane during daytime. However, even if the Sun is a source of heat (and not merely of light), the decreasing distances to the Sun are not enough to offset the cooling caused by moving farther from Hell/Earth's core. The overall effect is a significant temperature drop of 6.5°C per kilometer, up to around 11 Km in altitude.. We can observe this directly up to about 8.8 km in height, as when climbing Everest.

Thus, based on this analysis, it becomes evident that the strongest source of heat for the Earth's surface is Hell—the Earth's Kernel—and not the Sun, contrary to what one might assume.

However, according to the Bible (it is recommended to consult very ancient versions, translated prior to 1965, as Our Lady recommends in NY at https://www.tldm.org, 'Directives from heaven', 'Publications Before 1965', the Sun orbits the Earth and even simulates a seasonal effect, suggesting a rise / fall of the temperatures depending of the Sun’s distance to the Earth.

In practice, just like microbes and infectious diseases:

In tropical regions, during daytime and summertime, especially inland (e.g., the Sahara), temperatures are higher. This parallel the idea that when there are more active microbes, disease symptoms generally worsen. Hidden cause (for the temperatures, in parallel): increased/decreased thermal activity from Hell to induce those particular temperatures.
The Sun orbits the Earth in 24-hour cycles. It is closer to the tropic regions, and during the solstices, the Sun is closer to the respective tropic lines, as confirmed by the Bible, during its 24 hour orbits around the Earth.

As we have seen, with the variation in temperature by altitude, the temperature may fall 65°C, for a relative distance of 10 Km (a decrease of 6.5°C per km), caused by a greater distance from Hell/the Earth’s kernel, and the Sun cannot counter such thermal effect.

In practice, the Sun cannot warm the Earth—neither during the day nor at night—because, at night, the Sun is still visible, just on the opposite side of the planet, and the distances traveled by the Sun, over 12 or 24 hours are much bigger than 10 Km!!!

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

The Earth, Warmed from Hell. Examples of Temperature Inversions, Hard to Explain by Modern Science

(Continuation) Modern science might still argue that the first cause—the Sun—could be the only true influence on temperatures in cases such as the seasonal effect and the day/night cycle, because the distance from the Earth’s kernel to a specific point on the surface, e.g., New York, remains constant/stable.

But we can argue back using the Islamic Curse of the Desert by comparing the temperature differences in regions with similar latitudes and elevations, such as parts of Saudi Arabia and " the Australian outback—both warm and arid.

We observe that the Islamic curse worsens the temperatures in Saudi Arabia by approximately 5°C...

More information can be found in the sections 'Islamic Curse of the Desert' from the chapter 'Islam', namely, the section 'How the Islamic Curse of the Desert Destroyed the Rainy (= Felix) Arabia'.

Another example involves colder winter temperatures on the eastern sides of continents, despite similar latitudes:

The average winter temperature in Casablanca, Morocco, should be similar to that of Tokushima, Japan, as both are coastal cities at comparable altitudes. References: e.g., Wikipedia, 'Casablanca' and 'Tokushima'.

In reality, it's not the case: Tokushima is about 7°C colder. Yet Japan is an island, and Morocco is not...
A similar conclusion emerges when comparing the winter temperatures of Niigata, Japan (on the western coast), and Seville, southern Spain. There's a temperature difference of almost 9°C in January, with Niigata being significantly colder. References: e.g., References: e.g., Wikipedia, 'Niigata' and 'Seville'.
Another example: comparing winter temperatures along western coasts at similar latitudes— Inukjuak, Northern Quebec, Canada, and Juneau, Alaska, USA. The January temperature difference is almost 23°C, with Inukjuak (further east) being much colder. References: e.g., Wikipedia, 'Inukjuak' and 'Juneau'.
• Yet another example: comparing coastal locations near latitude ~38° (north or south)— Mar del Plata, Argentina, and Alicante, Spain. The difference is 4.2°C in the coldest month and 4.3°C in annual average temperature, with Mar del Plata (in eastern South America) being colder, as expected. References: e.g., Wikipedia, 'Mar del Plata' and 'Alicante'.

This is difficult to explain using conventional climate models. On the easter side of continents, winter temperatures are generally colder (in winter)—period.

Factors like continentality, wind patterns, and cold or warm ocean currents struggle to explain these differences for the coldest months.

There are several other inversions and contradictions that defy conventional climate logic.

The hottest temperatures ever recorded in the world are:

58°C / 136°F, in Aziziya, Northwestern coast of Libya, in 13 September 1922. Reference: e.g., Wikipedia, 'Aziziya'.

This record contradicts the logic of global warming, continentality, and the Sun’s effect (based on latitude and proximity). It occurred at 32°N latitude, not 21°N (sun effect), not deep in the Sahara, not in southern Algeria, not on June 21 (the solstice), and not in July/Augustus. It happened in 1922, not in 2025, as might be expected under current global warming (climate change) assumptions. Contradictions abound—that's why the professionals want to remove this record from the official statistics.
56.7°C / 134.1°F in Furnace Creek Ranch, Death Valley, USA, on July 10, 1913. Reference: e.g., Wikipedia.org, 'Furnace Creek'.

Again, this example presents several contradictions against modern global warming, continentality and solar influence. The location is at 36°N—only about 300 km from the pacific coast (Los Angeles) in a straight line—and not 21°N (sun effect), nor deeply inside the Sahara, nor in Southern Algeria (1833 km, from Bordj Badji Mokhtar to Alger, in straight line). It happened in 1913, not in 2025, as it should be expected.

Please note that the climate of the Sahara is still very aggressive, because of the Islamic Curse of the Desert. That's why it's used for comparison. The extreme, normal summer temperatures should be those of the Australian outback, which are a bit milder. More information on this subject is found at the section 'Islamic Curse of the Desert' of the 'Islam' chapter , and on the Internet, e.g., at Wikipedia, 'Bordj Badji Mokhtar' and 'Mount Isa'.

The Sun effect is not strong enough to influence the temperatures of a place by latitude, either.

The decisive factor is the Earth itself, from the inside (from Hell).

Temperature also changes with depth from the Earth’s surface: it increases, on average, by 25°C to 30°C per kilometrer for the first 10 km, according to official data. Reference: e.g., Wikipedia, 'Geothermal gradient'.

This is generally correct (considering the existence of volcanoes; Hell being located in the kernel of Earth).

Thus, the Sun effect is not strong enough to influence the temperatures of a place when going underground, either. The decisive factor is remains the Earth itself, from the inside (from Hell).

This analysis already proves something, but further inversions and contradictions should still be added: nights warmer than days, under the same weather conditions; summers colder than winters... For example, in Brussels, we can already have maximum temperatures of only 16°C for several days in Augustus, and maximum temperatures of 14-15°C for several days in January. These inversions exist, and the explanation given is no longer the sun effect, but the presence of cold or warm air masses: the thermal effect of Earth itself, and not the Sun directly, anymore...

The Sun seems more like a lamp or candle: it provides mainly, light not heat. The principle is similar to that of a dynamo, lamp, or electric motor—with a chemical reaction resembling "hydrolysis"—rather than that of the nuclear fusion (under extremely high pressures, where hydrogen becomes helium), confirms God.

Thus, as God said, most of this is caused by Hell, in the Earth's Kernel, and by its damned beings, through forced or voluntary labor and punishments—a Hell, therefore, that warms the Earth's surface. Some places may be better warmed, while others may be colder, according to different criteria, not the usual scientific ones (without God or the supernatural).

More information on the modern scientific astronomical errors can be found in the related sections of this chapter, beginning, for example, with the section 'Eccl 1:5 "The Sun Rises, Sets and Returns Back to Its Place"'.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

The Variation of Ocean Temperatures with Depth—Up to 1 Km Deep—Is Not Correctly Explained if We Remove the Divine Will

Oceanography provides several examples of inversions and contradictions in the variation of ocean temperatures with depth... There are temperature variations to suit every theory! Each logic contradicts the next if we don't take into account the existence of God and Hell to explain it.

The figure 6.2.4 from rwu.pressbooks.pub is accurate regarding ocean temperatures up to 1 km deep, designed to provide comfort to nature, said God. Reference: https://rwu.pressbooks.pub.

After this depth, temperatures rise quickly, also according to God.

Thus, in tropical regions, ocean temperatures drop about 20°C—from approximately 27°C to 7°C—when descending from the surface to 1,000 meters deep.

But in polar regions, the temperature of the colder ocean water remains relatively stable, and even rises slightly from around -2°C to approximately 4°C in winter, when diving down from the surface to 1,000 meters. This is necessary so that one does not walk over frozen oceans, because it has the risk of falling. The water just below is a bit warmer. The freezing point of seawater is around -2°C. The problem is that the logic here is no longer existing:

Nor the logic of the sun effect—even if it fits partly, for oceans outside polar regions. The increasing distance from the Sun cannot explain this rapid drop in ocean temperatures (about 20°C) when descending vertically to a depth of 1 km.

Indeed:
- If we move north (in the Northern hemisphere) by 1 km horizontally (Sun/latitude effect), temperatures don’t drop by 20°C, as they do in tropical waters vertically. Nor do they rise by 6°C, as in polar waters in winter.
- If the Sun moves 1 km west along the horizon (Sun/day-night effect), the temperature doesn't drop by ~20°C, as it does in tropical waters with depth, nor rise by 6°C as it does in polar waters after ~2.5 seconds (the time the Sun takes to travel ~1 km across the horizon).
Back to top
Nor the logic of rapid temperature increases when going underground—25-30°C per km from the Earth's surface to 1 km deep. The temperatures in the oceans could, by this logic, also increase quickly up to 1 km deep, since these regions are close to the Earth’s interior (magma...).
The temperature variation logic in polar waters is not the same as that in tropical waters—contradicting the "normal" analysis.

Indeed, there's a logic—but it's another one. If we take into account the existence of God, we understand this better:

Sea life needs comfort! God decided to provide appropriate ocean temperatures to the natural world! Simply that! That's why, when going further down from the ocean’s surface up to 1 km deep, all temperatures tend to values near 5°C.

Thus, sea life can live more comfortably, benefiting from ocean water temperatures ranging between ~30°C and ~-2°C. Reference, e.g.: https://www.giss.nasa.gov.

Other logics could impose more aggressive temperatures on nature.

With God’s help, we can go even further in this analysis: Why do surface temperatures range between ~15 and ~30°C in temperate and tropical waters (during summer)?

Answer: it's more suitable for swimming (in moderation). Down to 1 km the temperature drops to around 7°C, and the marine life can choose an adequate temperature.

Indeed, sunlight can reach depths up to ~1 km in ocean waters. This is therefore the region suitable for marine biology. Beyond this depth, oxygen is no longer produced (via photosynthesis). Deeper waters are thus no longer suitable for marine biology. After this point, the temperature begins to rise quickly— similar to the pattern observed when going underground from the Earth's surface.

People in tropical waters may swim a bit, but not much either... sharks are there for that.

But in polar waters, the opposite is true: sharks are not welcome there. That's why temperatures rise slightly when going down up to 1 km in the polar region—but not by much.

Indeed, when someone walks on frozen polar waters, they risks falling into the cold ocean. That's already a severe punishment.

Therefore, there's no need for sharks coming from the deeper (warmer) waters to reach the surface and attack victims who have fallen into the cold polar waters. To ensure that, the polar waters 1 km deep are only around ~4°C warm and not more...

The logic of variation in the ocean temperatures with the depth—up to 1 km deep—is, thus, this one: the comfort of nature, according to the will of God. With this reasoning, all is very easily explained...

But, if we remove God and His will, and try to explain this in the normal modern scientific way, we then find contradictions non-stop... to be compared with the complex (~~imaginary~~ ⇒ supernatural: √-1,√-2...) numbers, ℂ, for Mathematics...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Curiosity: Possible Real Causes of Forest Fires

I think judges sometimes condemn unfairly persons presumed to have pyromaniac behavior.

In some cases, those kind of individuals do set fires, yes, on a land near a forested area, but their goal is not to destroy forests through forest fires—it’s to prepare a barbecue or light a cigarette...

Such behavior is considered inadequate and dangerous, but these small barbecue fires happen in relative isolated places and usually don't trigger a forest fire. However, exceptions can indeed happen...

Some of these persons are not motivated to destroy the forests; their goal is simply to light a cigarette or to make a barbecue, and that is not the usual cause of forest fires.

One of the real causes of forest fires seem to be something else: demons in human forms, furious because of the inappropriate behavior of certain people—e.g., the practice of illegitimate sex and/or other sins...

For example, what can happen is that, in the case of illegitimate sex, illicit pleasures are achieved through supernatural activity performed by the demons involved, and they are angry because they are active and providing sexual pleasures to people who do not deserve them.

Or maybe those people deserve sexual pleasure—but legitimate ones—and they have a group of opponents (other people) who attack their wish to form legitimate couples.

These demons, therefore, sometimes take revenge against society triggering forest fires—setting one fire after another in an organized way, in order to cause massive destruction.

These demons have supernatural powers and are not brought justice or jailed. If they're caught near a fire, they simply disappear, and that’s it...

But some of the people called pyromaniacs are caught, for instance, lighting a fire for a barbecue—something completely unrelated—and this people risk going to jail… a bit unfair, but justice had not the necessary knowledge to make better decisions until now...

However, in some cases, certain individuals do indeed have pyromaniac behavior as well... So, it’s a bit complex—something to be judged case by case. I believe I received part of this information from God, in order to help correct such injustices...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Jesus of the Divine Mercy: Those who Honor Jesus, with full trust, through the preceding Picture, shall be Saved* from Hell.

* - WARNING: IF YOU ACCEPT THE MARK 666 IN the BODY (an electronic chip in the hand or in the forehead), OR IF YOU WORSHIP THE ANTICHRIST OR HIS IMAGE, YOU WILL END UP IN HELL, as stated in the Book of Revelation 14:9-11, EVEN IF YOU HONOR THE DIVINE MERCY JESUS OF SAINT FAUSTINA, with full trust...

Please Scroll further Down, to Fully See the Summary...

I try to pray for the protection of all the pro God of the planet, until 00:00h, to try to disinfest, but it's better to complement it with a 24h protective prayer, as the daily Rosary (praying it attentively), or to pray the daily Rosary 2× (or more).

Summary of the Web Site

Catholic Russia Converted Ideas

Made in Belgium, E.U.

www.christianideas.eu:

DISCERNMENT: for example, the true faith is Catholic, conservative, and non-naive. The incorruptible miraculous corpses of Catholic saints (e.g., Padre Pio) and the Holy Blood of Jesus reveal God’s will regarding doctrine and spiritual authority of the time.

Doctrine: Catholic Roman conservative and Authority: still the Vatican.

More information about this can be found in the chapters 'Miracles and Discernment' and 'Danger of Apocalypse'.
Idea to Become Rich, in a Pro-God Way, in the chapter 'Rich'.

Traps for rich and for the Holy Host can be found in the chapter 'Protections Against Evil'.
Danger of Apocalypse (Prophecies of S. Malachy): risk of Sect 'New Age' in Rome ⇒ the Apocalypse... ⇒ it's better to be in a state of grace and/or to go to confession as soon as possible with a Catholic Priest (after Benedict XVI), in case of sin. Also, pray the Rosary under the required conditions to receive a plenary* indulgence, remain a good practicing Catholic conservative, and pray the Rosary daily to fight back against evil.

* - Rejection of all sins, for the Pope’s good intentions, in church, community or family. If not in church, community or family, pray it several times, to obtain the same effect.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Risk of Great Famine ⇒ News from Heaven through, e.g., Wings of Prophecy, L. de Maria, J. Leary... Links available in the chapter 'Links'.

Ideas (pro-God) to try to resist the Great Famine:
- St Onofre, with a Crumb of Bread, in the chapter 'Protections Against Evil'.
- Blessed Grapes of L. de Maria + S. Damian, at, e.g., https://www.revelacionesmarianas.com.

MODERN LIES Unmasked, for example, in the chapter 'Arguments Against Darwinism' (Lies of Darwinism, Fake Dates...).

History and demographics, since ~2000BC, unmask the fake dates: The Earth was nearly empty after the Great Flood.

Hominids were hybrids, which existed before the Great Flood. This is confirmed by Jesus at the old website from V. De Tarlé apparitionsmariales.org, in French, at http://vincentdetarle.free.fr...

Proactive Darwinism: The ~mouse evolves to ⇒ bat ⇒ vampire, thus, the ancestor of the man/whale, etc., evolves to ⇒ Batman ⇒ Dracula, in the same ~millions of years...
Migrations based in Y-haplogroups (DNA) tend to support that Atlantis sank ⇒ ice ages, prior the time of Moses? More details in the 'Atlantis' chapter.
DANGER OF Apocalypse: CHIP 666 IN BODY, WW3, dangerous modern vaccines, “good” sect New Age, THE GLOBAL EMPIRE SOCIALIST COMMUNIST OF the ANTICHRIST... ⇒ extensive apocalyptic prophecy is available at: www.tldm.org (for scenario 'Russia Not Converted'). More information available in the chapter 'Danger of Apocalypse'.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

ICON OF the AUTOMATIC Eternal SALVATION*
(also in the beginning of this section):

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* (Jesus, as revealed to St Faustina, with blue and red rays).

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...
PROTECTIONS against EVIL, though some suffering is needed, sorry!

A summary follows a bit further.

IMMORTALITY SUGGESTION:

PRAYING TO GOD, for the ETERNAL SALVATION, of THOSE WHO NEED IT MOST, 'only' CALMS DANGERS for LIFE.

You have nothing to lose, with a proper use, especially if you feel close to dying—even if the formula is limited... However, abuse may be severely punished!

Afterward, begin a discreet fast and daily prayer (such as the Rosary), prayed attentively until it calms or improves. ⇒ OK, it’s not so easy, but it's better than cancer surgeries (1-4 days of this should calm the Flu, with whiskey at the bottom of the glass to disinfect). More information is available in the chapter 'Ideas for Extending Life and Improving Health'.
LGBT + Modern Sex BEHAVIORS: These are unhealthy and can even KILL...

It’s possible to attack the subconscious, e. g., via discreet witchcraft... ⇒ See the Nero Case Study... Risks of DETACHED INTESTINE... Please refer to the chapter 'LGBT Sex Kills, etc.'.
~3.5 BILLIONS MURDERS, SINCE ~1960: The horrors of ABORTION... This Attracts Punishments... More details, in the chapter 'Abortion: a Calamity'.
IDEAS AGAINST Evil —e.g., against AGING & FLU/PLAGUE, are available in the chapter 'Protections Against Evil'.

Better, more pro-God alternatives: Fast & Prayer (effective against Evil ⇒ Medjugorje), until it calms... (Discreet Fast & Prayer, in secret, or in solidarity group, prayer as the daily Rosary, prayed attentively, or the daily Rosary 2×, or the 7 sorrows).
- Some food may help: avoid white sugars (fruits, honey, stevia, are better if sweet food is needed); drink 1/4 glass of whiskey or vodka (⇒ let it disinfect, a few minutes, in the throat...), 1/5 glass vinegar, 2 cloves raw, well chopped garlic mixed, e.g., in the salad, to help to counter PLAGUE...
- Immortality Suggestion, in dramatic cases, to try to calm the situation, and, instead of dying, gain the strength to pray a Rosary (attentively)...
- Our Lady of the Roses honored / exposed, and the death (possibly) won’t come inside. More details available in the chapter 'Protections Against Evil'.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

MODERN VACCINES TO BE AVOIDED.

Alternatives: Protections against the Apocalypse + Formula 'Fast & Prayer' (please see previous text).

IDEAS FOR A BETTER LOOK, in the chapter 'Ladies & Veil (+ Men)'.

The dream lady is the beautiful blond lady with blue eyes. Now it is about aesthetics. To Marry a brunette woman is like a woman marrying a poor or poorer man. It's better than nothing, but it bothers.

Aesthetic care helps, like money, in marriage... Comparative Tables available in the section 'Our Lady of Fatima Deserves a Better Look' from the chapter 'Ladies and Veil (+ Men)'.
Eden Garden Located. Noah's Ark Found. See the chapters "Eden" and "Noah’s Ark" for more information.
MODERN WOMAN IDEOLOGY UNMASKED:

The Demographic fall in the West (+ Russia)...

Statistics (1950 or) 1970 - 2024: Germany × India... Available in the chapter 'Ladies & Veil (+ Men)'.
LINKS TO some HEAVEN NEWS, in the 'Links' chapter.
Possible: T-shirts, posters, “songs”, books, 'Christian ideas' and/or 'Russia converted catholic ideas' (‘made in Belgium’)...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

The Book "Mysteries of the Bible Revealed, Christian Ideas and Discernment" is already available in:

Dutch English French Portuguese Spanish.
Ideas Against Cancer, in the chapter 'Ideas for Trying to Extend Life and for Better Health'.
School: e.g., math, computer science, multiple integrals for kids, exercises, complements to Wikipedia.

Christian Ideas, at X / Twitter: @IdeasChris54837, at https://x.com/IdeasChris54837.
Christian Ideas at Linkedin
(https://be.linkedin.com/in/christian-ideas-104ba893).

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

If you want to defend good:

PROTECTIONS against EVIL (please refer to www.christianideas.eu) and take up the Cross Recommended. E.g.:

IMMORTALITY SUGGESTION, correct use, at the first sign of danger. More information can be found in the chapter 'Ideas for Trying to Prolong Life'.
To Do a CONTRACT WITH GOD (ICON of the AUTOMATIC Eternal SALVATION*, THROUGH DIVINE MERCY). More information on the main web page at christianideas.eu.

To Pray, everyday (better: Attentively):
- The Rosary**, 2× (or more), available, e.g., in the chapter 'Protections Against Evil', and/or
- The 7 Sorrows***, and/or
- The Crusade Prayer 33, e. g., in the Chapter 'Protections Against Evil',
- The Crusade Prayer 140, against FEARS, e. g., in the Chapter 'Protections Against Evil',
- The short Amsterdam Prayer (against Catastrophes), available, e. g., in the Chapter 'Terrorism', etc.
To be clean of sins or to go to Confession, to the Catholic priest and to pray a Rosary under the conditions required, for a plenary indulgence**, as soon as possible... More details, in the chapter 'Protections Against Evil'.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the antichrist, this promise is not valid anymore...

** - it's better to pray the Rosary, in church, family or community, with rejection of all the sins, in state of grace, praying for the (good) intentions of the pope, in order to try to get a plenary indulgence...

*** - 7 Sorrows of Mary: 7 Hail Marys + 7 meditations (sorrows). Meditation on each sorrow, during each Hail Mary. Reference: https://www.qsl.net.

The '7 Meditations' follow:

1. Prophecy of Simeon,

2. The flight to Egypt,

3. The child Jesus lost for 3 days,

4. The Way of the Cross,

5. Death on the Cross,

6. The Descent from the Cross,

7. the Burial of Jesus.

I try to pray for the protection of all the pro-God people of the planet, until 00:00h, to try to disinfest, but it's better to complement it with 24h protective prayer, e.g., the Rosary or the daily Rosary 2× (better: prayed attentively, under the required conditions, to get a plenary indulgence).

Satan demanded to God 75 - 100 years, plus money and power, in order to destroy the Vatican ⇒ www.tldm.org.

Satan had that time, that money, and that power.

~140 years later, despite the dangers and evil, the Vatican still resists.

Let us see evolution... ??? Apocalyptic? Reversal back to God (again)???

Evil no longer triumphs, since ~2024, but the apocalyptic temptation persists. There's still, therefore, a Danger of Apocalypse, within the next ~50 years (if the Apocalypse does not happen sooner).

The best prepared (well prepared) are protected. The best is to prepare yourself, as soon as possible, to try to be protected. More information is available in the section 'How To Be Ready to Enter in the Paradise of God?' from the chapter 'Discernment'.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Note: www.christianideas.eu began in ~2009 and keeps improving. IT REMAINS INCOMPLETE + IMPERFECT.

If God helps, I'll try to improve it and/or correct any detected errors, content and design, little by little.

A backup, in .zip format exists (you may also download it via the website, left column, above—using, for example, the Firefox browser). This backup contains the most important part of the website.

You may print or copy the contents of the website / free book, but in accordance with the content license, above left, in this Web page...

Good-intentioned publicity, pro-God, pro-True Faith, is welcome!!!

Protections from God are then recommended! Evil doesn't like it...

Good News: God decided to collaborate with www.christianideas.eu and became already the main Author, the Author 1 of this Web site, even if some weak points remain. Yes!

Below: Our Lady of the Roses honored / exposed, and death possibly doesn't enter inside.
Source: Jesus, at the old website apparitionsmariales.

Right Click + "Save as", to download the images (in the computer)...

Freemasonry, if with Sabotage Purposes, against God's interests, is Forbidden...

Translations for the Catholic Russia Converted Website.

العربية (Arabic)

خدمات الترجمة العامة لمتصفحات الويب

على سبيل المثال، في المتصفحات (Chrome، Edge...)،

Windows:

Chrome: انقر بزر الماوس الأيمن، حيث يكون مؤشر الماوس على شكل سهم ← ترجمة (صفحة الويب هذه) إلى اللغة (المحددة)... بعد ذلك، تظهر نافذة لغة صغيرة، أعلى متصفح الويب، حيث يمكنك اختيار اللغة المراد ترجمتها.

Edge: الرجاء النقر على الجانب الأيمن من شريط عنوان الويب ، لغة الرمز بعد ذلك ، تظهر نافذة لغة صغيرة أعلى متصفح الويب ، حيث يمكنك تحديد اللغة المراد ترجمتها.

ملحوظة: إذا كنت تريد ترجمة صفحة ويب أخرى، من فضلك العودة إلى النسخة الأصلية (الإنجليزية) من هذا / موقع الويب المعني، افتح الصفحة التي تريد ترجمتها (لا تزال باللغة الإنجليزية) وترجمتها بعد ذلك، كما ذكرنا أعلاه.

Android (Chrome): الجزء العلوي من الشاشة ← انقر فوق 3 نقاط (عمودي) ← يترجم...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

বাংলা (Bangla)

ওয়েব ব্রাউজারের সাধারণ অনুবাদ পরিষেবা

যেমন, ব্রাউজারে (Chrome, Edge...),

Windows:

ক্রোম: মাউস দিয়ে রাইট ক্লিক করুন, যেখানে মাউস কার্সারের তীর→ (প্রদত্ত) ভাষায় (এই ওয়েব পৃষ্ঠা) অনুবাদ করুন... এর পরে, এটি ওয়েব ব্রাউজারের শীর্ষে একটি ছোট ভাষা উইন্ডো প্রদর্শিত হবে, যেখানে আপনি অনুবাদ করার জন্য ভাষা নির্বাচন করতে পারেন।

Edge: অনুগ্রহ করে ওয়েব ঠিকানা বারের ডান পাশে, আইকন ভাষাতে ক্লিক করুন তারপরে, এটি ওয়েব ব্রাউজারের শীর্ষে একটি ছোট ভাষা উইন্ডো প্রদর্শিত হবে, যেখানে আপনি অনুবাদ করার জন্য ভাষা নির্বাচন করতে পারেন।

দ্রষ্টব্য: আপনি যদি অন্য ওয়েব পৃষ্ঠা অনুবাদ করতে চান, অনুগ্রহ করে এটির (ইংরেজি) মূল সংস্করণে ফিরে যান সংশ্লিষ্ট ওয়েব সাইট, আপনি যে পৃষ্ঠাটি অনুবাদ করতে চান সেটি খুলুন (এখনও ইংরেজিতে) এবং উপরে উল্লিখিত হিসাবে পরে এটি অনুবাদ করুন।

Android (Chrome): পর্দার শীর্ষে → 3 পয়েন্টে ক্লিক করুন (উল্লম্ব) → অনুবাদ করা...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

中文 (Chinese)

网络浏览器的通用翻译服务

例如，在浏览器（Chrome、Edge...）中

Windows:

Chrome：用鼠标右键单击，鼠标光标呈箭头形式→ 将（此网页）翻译成（给定的）语言... 然后，在网络浏览器的顶部会出现一个小的语言窗口，您可以在其中选择要翻译的语言。

Edge：请点击网址栏右侧图标语言之后，它会在网络浏览器的顶部出现一个小语言窗口，您可以在其中选择要翻译的语言。

注意：如果您想翻译其他网页，请返回此/的（英文）原始版本相关网站，打开您要翻译的页面（仍然是英文）然后像上面提到的那样翻译它。

Android (Chrome)：屏幕顶部 → 单击 3 点（垂直）→ 翻译...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Deutsch (German)

Allgemeine Übersetzungsdienste für Webbrowser

Z.B., in den Browsern (Chrome, Edge...),

Windows:

Chrome: Rechtsklick mit der Maus, wobei der Mauszeiger die Form eines Pfeils hat → Übersetzen Sie (diese Webseite) in die (angegebene) Sprache ... Anschließend erscheint oben im Webbrowser ein kleines Sprachfenster. Hier können Sie die zu übersetzende Sprache auswählen.

Edge: Bitte klicken Sie rechts in der Webadressleiste, oben im Webbrowser, auf das Symbol „Sprache“. Anschließend erscheint, oben im Webbrowser, ein kleines Sprachfenster, Hier können Sie die zu übersetzende Sprache auswählen.

Hinweis: Wenn Sie eine andere Webseite übersetzen möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an uns Zurück zur (englischen) Originalversion dieses / des betroffene Website, Öffnen Sie die Seite, die Sie übersetzen möchten (immer noch auf Englisch). und übersetzen Sie es anschließend, wie oben erwähnt.

Android (Chrome): Oberer Bildschirmrand → Klicken Sie auf 3 Punkte (vertikal) → Übersetzen...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Español (Spanish)

Servicios Generales de Traducción de Navegadores Web

Por ejemplo, en los Navegadores (Chrome, Edge...),

Windows:

Chrome: Haga clic derecho, con el mouse, donde el cursor del mouse tiene forma de flecha → Traducir (esta página web) al idioma (dado)... Luego, aparece una pequeña ventana de idioma, en la parte superior del navegador web, donde podrás seleccionar el idioma a traducir.

Edge: haga clic en el lado derecho de la barra de direcciones del navegador Web, icono de idioma Luego, aparece una pequeña ventana de idioma en la parte superior del navegador web, donde puede seleccionar el idioma a traducir.

Nota: Si desea traducir otra página Web, por favor volver a la versión original (inglés) de este / el sitio web en cuestión, abre la página que deseas traducir (aún en inglés) y traducirlo después, como se mencionó anteriormente.

Android (Chrome): Parte superior de la pantalla → haga clic en 3 puntos (vertical) → Traducir...

Nota 2: También puede descargar el libro en Español, “Misterios de la Biblia Revelados, Ideas Cristianas y Discernimiento”, en formato .pdf, que contiene la mayor parte del contenido de este sitio Web.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Français (French)

Services Généraux de Traduction des Navigateurs Web

Par exemple, dans les Navigateurs Web (Chrome, Edge...),

Windows:

Chrome: clic droit avec la souris, le curseur de la souris ayant la forme d'une flèche → Traduire (cette page Web) dans la langue (donnée)... Ensuite, une petite fenêtre de langue apparaît, en haut du navigateur Web, où vous pouvez sélectionner la langue à traduire.

Edge: veuillez cliquer sur le côté droit de la barre d'adresse du navigateur Web, icône de langue Ensuite, une petite application web de langue apparaît, en haut du navigateur Web, où vous pouvez sélectionner la langue à traduire.

Remarque: Si vous souhaitez traduire une autre page Web, veuillez revenir à la version originale (anglaise) de ce / du site internet concerné, ouvrez la page que vous souhaitez traduire (toujours en anglais) et traduisez-le ensuite, comme mentionné ci-dessus.

Android (Chrome): Haut de l'écran → cliquez sur 3 points (vertical) → Traduire...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Hausa (Hausa)

Gabaɗaya Sabis na Fassarar Masu Binciken Gidan Yanar Gizo

Misali, a cikin Browser (Chrome, Edge...),

Windows:

Chrome: Danna Dama, tare da linzamin kwamfuta, inda siginan linzamin kwamfuta yana da nau'i na kibiya → Fassara (wannan shafin yanar gizon) zuwa harshen (wanda aka bayar)... Bayan haka, yana bayyana ƙaramin tagar harshe, a saman burauzar gidan yanar gizon, inda zaku iya zaɓar yaren don fassarawa.

Edge: da fatan za a danna a gefen dama na sandar adireshin gidan yanar gizo, alamar harshe Bayan haka, yana bayyana ƙaramin tagar harshe a saman burauzar gidan yanar gizon, inda zaku iya zaɓar yaren don fassarawa.

Lura: Idan kuna son fassara wani shafin yanar gizon, don Allah komawa zuwa asalin (Turanci) na wannan / da gidan yanar gizon damuwa, bude shafin da kake son fassarawa (har yanzu a Turanci) kuma a fassara shi daga baya, kamar yadda aka ambata a sama.

Android (Chrome): saman allo → danna maki 3 (a tsaye) → Fassara...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

हिन्दी (Hindi)

वेब ब्राउज़र की सामान्य अनुवाद सेवाएँ

उदाहरण के लिए, ब्राउज़र में (क्रोम, एज...),

Windows:

क्रोम: माउस से राइट क्लिक करें, जहां माउस कर्सर में तीर का आकार होता है → (इस वेब पेज का) दी गई भाषा में अनुवाद करें... इसके बाद, वेब ब्राउज़र के शीर्ष पर एक छोटी भाषा विंडो दिखाई देती है, जहां आप अनुवाद करने के लिए भाषा का चयन कर सकते हैं।

Edge: कृपया वेब एड्रेस बार, आइकन भाषा के दाईं ओर क्लिक करें बाद में, यह वेब ब्राउज़र के शीर्ष पर एक छोटी सी भाषा विंडो दिखाई देती है, जहां आप अनुवाद करने के लिए भाषा का चयन कर सकते हैं।

नोट: यदि आप किसी अन्य वेब पेज का अनुवाद करना चाहते हैं, तो कृपया इसके (अंग्रेज़ी) मूल संस्करण पर वापस लौटें संबंधित वेब साइट, वह पृष्ठ खोलें जिसका आप अनुवाद करना चाहते हैं (अभी भी अंग्रेजी में) और बाद में इसका अनुवाद करें, जैसा कि ऊपर बताया गया है।

Android (Chrome): स्क्रीन का शीर्ष → 3 बिंदुओं पर क्लिक करें (ऊर्ध्वाधर) → अनुवाद करना...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

日本語 (Japanese)

Webブラウザの翻訳サービス全般

たとえば、ブラウザ (Chrome、Edge...) では、

Windows:

Chrome: マウスカーソルが矢印の形になっている場所をマウスで右クリックします → (この Web ページを) (指定された) 言語に翻訳します... その後、Web ブラウザの上部に小さな言語ウィンドウが表示されます。翻訳する言語を選択できます。

Edge: Web アドレスバーの右側にあるアイコンの言語をクリックしてくださいその後、Web ブラウザの上部に小さな言語ウィンドウが表示されます。翻訳する言語を選択できます。

注: 別の Web ページを翻訳したい場合は、この/の元の (英語) バージョンに戻る関係するウェブサイト、翻訳したいページを開きます（まだ英語です）上で述べたように、後で翻訳します。

Android (Chrome)：画面上部 → 3 点（垂直）をクリック → 翻訳...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Melayu (Malay)

Perkhidmatan Terjemahan Umum Penyemak Imbas Web

Cth., dalam Penyemak Imbas (Chrome, Edge...),

Windows:

Chrome: Klik Kanan, dengan tetikus, di mana kursor tetikus mempunyai bentuk anak panah → Terjemah (halaman web ini) ke bahasa (diberikan)... Selepas itu, ia muncul tetingkap bahasa kecil, di bahagian atas pelayar web, di mana anda boleh memilih bahasa untuk diterjemahkan.

Edge: sila klik di sebelah kanan bar alamat web, bahasa ikon Selepas itu, ia muncul tetingkap bahasa kecil di bahagian atas pelayar web, di mana anda boleh memilih bahasa untuk diterjemahkan.

Nota: Jika anda ingin menterjemah halaman web lain, sila kembali ke versi asal (Bahasa Inggeris) ini / the laman web berkenaan, buka halaman yang ingin anda terjemahkan (masih dalam bahasa Inggeris) dan terjemahkannya selepas itu, seperti yang dinyatakan di atas.

Android (Chrome): Bahagian Atas Skrin → klik 3 mata (menegak) → Terjemah...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

پارسی (Persian)

خدمات ترجمه عمومی مرورگرهای وب

به عنوان مثال، در مرورگرها (Chrome، Edge...)،

Windows:

Chrome: با ماوس کلیک راست کنید، جایی که نشانگر ماوس شکلی از فلش دارد ← ترجمه (این صفحه وب) به زبان (داده شده)... پس از آن، یک پنجره زبان کوچک در بالای مرورگر وب ظاهر می شود، جایی که می توانید زبان مورد نظر را برای ترجمه انتخاب کنید.

لبه: لطفاً روی نماد زبان در سمت راست نوار آدرس وب کلیک کنید. پس از آن، یک پنجره زبان کوچک در بالای مرورگر وب ظاهر می شود که می توانید زبانی را برای ترجمه انتخاب کنید.

توجه: اگر می خواهید صفحه وب دیگری را ترجمه کنید، لطفاً بازگشت به نسخه اصلی (انگلیسی) این / the وب سایت مربوطه، صفحه ای را که می خواهید ترجمه کنید باز کنید (هنوز به زبان انگلیسی) و پس از آن همانطور که در بالا ذکر شد ترجمه کنید.

Android (Chrome): بالای صفحه ← روی 3 نقطه (عمودی) کلیک کنید ← ترجمه کردن...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Português (Portuguese)

Serviços Gerais de Tradução de Navegadores da Web

Por exemplo, nos Navegadores Web (Chrome, Edge...),

Windows:

Chrome: clique, com o botão direito do rato, por ex., aqui → Traduzir (esta página da Web) para a língua proposta... Aparece então, no topo do navegador Web, uma pequena aplicação de idioma, onde poderá selecionar o idioma a traduzir.

Edge: clicar no lado direito da barra de endereço do navegador Web, no ícone de idioma. De seguida, aparece uma pequena aplicação de idioma no topo do navegador web, onde pode selecionar o idioma para traduzir.

Nota: Se quiser traduzir outra página da Web, por favor retornar à versão original em inglês deste / do site Web em questão, abra a página web que deseja traduzir (ainda em inglês) e traduza-a depois, como mencionado acima.

Android (Chrome): Parte superior do écran → clique em 3 pontos (vertical) → Traduzir...

Nota2: Também pode descargar o livro em português, "Mistérios da Biblia Revelados, Ideias Cristãs e Discernimento", em formato .pdf, que contém a maior parte do conteúdo deste site Web.

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Русский (Russian)

Общие услуги перевода веб-браузеров

Например, в браузерах (Chrome, Edge...)

Windows:

Chrome: щелкните правой кнопкой мыши там, где курсор мыши имеет форму стрелки → Перевести (эту веб-страницу) на (данный) язык... После этого в верхней части веб-браузера появится небольшое языковое окно. где вы можете выбрать язык для перевода.

Edge: нажмите справа от строки веб-адреса, язык значков После этого в верхней части веб-браузера появляется небольшое языковое окно, где вы можете выбрать язык для перевода.

Примечание. Если вы хотите перевести другую веб-страницу, пожалуйста, вернуться к (английской) оригинальной версии этого / соответствующий веб-сайт, откройте страницу, которую хотите перевести (все еще на английском языке) и переведите его потом, как упоминалось выше.

Android (Chrome): Верхняя часть экрана → нажмите 3 точки (по вертикали) → Переводить...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Tagalog (Tagalog)

Pangkalahatang Serbisyo sa Pagsasalin ng mga Web Browser

Hal., sa Mga Browser (Chrome, Edge...),

Windows:

Chrome: Right Click, gamit ang mouse, kung saan ang mouse cursor ay may anyo ng arrow → Isalin (ang web page na ito) sa (ibinigay) na wika... Pagkatapos, lumilitaw ang isang maliit na window ng wika, sa tuktok ng web browser, kung saan maaari mong piliin ang wikang isasalin.

Edge: mangyaring mag-click sa kanang bahagi ng web address bar, sa tuktok ng web browser, sa wika ng icon Pagkatapos, lumilitaw ang isang maliit na window ng wika sa tuktok ng web browser, kung saan maaari mong piliin ang wikang isasalin.

Tandaan: Kung gusto mong magsalin ng isa pang web page, mangyaring bumalik sa (Ingles) orihinal na bersyon nito / ang kinauukulang web site, buksan ang pahinang gusto mong isalin (sa Ingles pa rin) at isalin ito pagkatapos, gaya ng nabanggit sa itaas.

Android (Chrome): Itaas ng Screen → i-click ang 3 puntos (vertical) → Isalin...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Türkçe (Turkish)

Web Tarayıcılarının Genel Çeviri Hizmetleri

Örneğin, Tarayıcılarda (Chrome, Edge...),

Windows:

Chrome: Fare imlecinin ok biçiminde olduğu yere fareyle sağ tıklayın → (Bu web sayfasını) (belirtilen) dile çevirin... Daha sonra web tarayıcısının üst kısmında küçük bir dil penceresi görünür. tercüme edilecek dili seçebileceğiniz yer.

Edge: lütfen web adres çubuğunun sağ tarafında, simge dilini tıklayın Daha sonra, web tarayıcısının üst kısmında küçük bir dil penceresi belirir, çevrilecek dili seçebileceğiniz yer.

Not: Başka bir web sayfasını çevirmek istiyorsanız lütfen bunun (İngilizce) orijinal versiyonuna geri dön / ilgili web sitesi, çevirmek istediğiniz sayfayı açın (hala İngilizce) ve daha sonra yukarıda belirtildiği gibi tercüme edin.

Android (Chrome): Ekranın Başı → 3 noktayı tıklayın (dikey) → Çevirmek...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Other Languages: Swedish...

General Translation Services of Web Browsers, e. g., to Other Languages: Greek...

E. g., in the Browsers (Chrome, Edge...),

Windows:

Chrome: Right Click with the mouse, e. g., Here → Translate (this web page) to the (given) language... Afterwards, it appears a small language window, on the top of the web browser, where you can select the language to translate.

Edge: please click at the right side of the web address bar, on the top of the web browser, in the icon language Afterwards, it appears a small language window on the top of the web browser, where you can select the language to translate.

Note: If you want to translate another web page, please return to the (English) original version of (this) web site, open the page you want to translate (still in English) and translate it afterwards, as mentioned above.

Android (Chrome): Top of Screen → click 3 points (vertical) → Translate...

THOSE WHO TRUST 100% IN JESUS, through THIS PICTURE, SHALL BE SAVED* from Hell.

* - However, if the concerned person submits to the Antichrist, this promise is no longer valid...

Below: Our Lady of the Roses honored / exposed, and death possibly doesn't enter inside.
Source: Jesus, at the old website apparitionsmariales.

Right Click + "Save as", to download the images (in the computer)...

Freemasonry, if with Sabotage Purposes, against God's interests, is Forbidden...

Content's License.

Bible and Science I.

Bible and Science I: Summary.

The Logic of the Geostationary Satellites Contradicting Copernicus – Part I.

The Logic of the Geostationary Satellites Contradicting Copernicus – Part II.

Astronomy and Bible: Introduction.

Big Bang or 6 Days Theory?

Ecclesiastes 1:5 "The Sun Rises, Sets and Returns Back to Its Place"

The Earth: In the Center of the Universe?

How Can We Prove the Rotation of the Earth in 28 Days and the Orbit of the Sun Around the Earth in 24 Hours?

And Is It Possible to Prove This Rotation of the Earth, in 28 Days, in an Easy Way?

How Does This Eastward Movement Explain the Rotation of the Earth, in 28 Days and the Orbit of the Sun Around the Earth in 24 Hours?

What About the Wind?

Why Did Copernicus's Heliocentrism Triumph Over Geocentrism?

The Logic of the Geostationary Satellites Contradicting Copernicus - Part I.

The Logic of the Geostationary Satellites Contradicting Copernicus - Part II.

Is It Possible, for a Star, To Fall on Earth, from the Sky, as Rev 8:10-11 Says?

Curiosities.

Earth Flat or Round? Four Corners?

Example 1: Does the Earth have Four Corners?

Example 2: The Vault or the Circle of the Earth?

Israel, the Navel of the Earth?

Has the Earth Pillars?

Is the Universe in Expansion?

Are the Continents in Displacement?

Proofs that Diseases Are Caused by Discreet Witchcraft (Second Cause, in Parallel, but Hidden).

Why Are Most of the Contagions by Flu Caused by Discreet Witchcraft?

Why Are Most of the Smells Caused by Discreet Witchcraft? Over Dirtiness

Is the Theory of the Relativity True, With Stars Moving at Speeds Three Times Faster Than the Speed of Light?

Theory of Relativity, Part 2: Curve Space-Time or Cartesian Coordinate System (3D) for Space?

Considerations on Matter and Antimatter, Black Holes, the Birth and Death of Stars.

Science Cannot Properly Explain How Cows Produce Milk

And How Do We Explain This?

Curiosity: Possible Real Causes of Forest Fires

Summary of the Web Site

Catholic Russia Converted Ideas

www.christianideas.eu:

Translations for the Catholic Russia Converted Website.

العربية (Arabic)

বাংলা (Bangla)

中文 (Chinese)

Deutsch (German)

Español (Spanish)

Français (French)

Hausa (Hausa)

हिन्दी (Hindi)

日本語 (Japanese)

Melayu (Malay)

پارسی (Persian)

Português (Portuguese)

Русский (Russian)

Tagalog (Tagalog)

Türkçe (Turkish)

Other Languages: Swedish...

Main MENU

Better to Be Vigilant.